“This is wrong. The bill enables police brutality and removing the oversight board allows for more coverups. We won't support this never”
Police Authority Expansion Act of 2024
Rationale
To enhance public safety and national security by strengthening policing powers, ensuring accountability through internal review, and maintaining strict order during critical times.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armed Police |
All frontline officers routinely armed
|
Police routinely carry military-grade weapons
|
|
| 2 | Police Accountability |
Civilian oversight board that can dismiss officers and open prosecutions
|
Police investigate their own complaints
|
|
| 3 | Police Body Cameras |
Continuous recording; any citizen may request footage of themselves
|
No cameras; filming the police is a criminal offence
|
|
| 4 | Police Powers |
Community policing focused on prevention
|
Martial law (military policing; shoot-on-sight authorised for curfew violations)
|
|
| 5 | Youth Curfew Policy |
No youth curfew (standard public order laws only)
|
Universal curfew (nobody leaves home between 20:00-06:00 without state permission)
|
1
Armed Police2
Police Accountability3
Police Body Cameras4
Police Powers5
Youth Curfew PolicyProposer
Party
National Front Of Javosca
The NFJ advocates for the protection of the national culture of our nation, the strengthening of the Executive and bringing back gentlemanry to our society through a strong platform.
Core pillars
Bernard Sinclair
Candidate for President · Age 37
A street-smart radical with a flair for the dramatic, Bernard Sinclair’s unshakable devotion to the cause and silver-tongued wit have turned skeptics into disciples, though his unpredictable antics keep even allies guessing.
Timeline
-
Draft23 January 2024
-
Vote Open23 January 2024
-
Vote Closed23 March 2024
-
Did Not Become Law23 March 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Congress
FailedFor: 128 / 543 seats (23.6%)
Against: 250 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 165
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 0 | No | This is complete nonsense; we won’t shoot at our own people. |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 128 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 0 | No | This is wrong. The bill enables police brutality and removing the oversight board allows for more coverups. We won't support this never |
| Red Green Labor | 250 | No | We reject this proposal our individual freedom is not for sale |
Senate
FailedFor: 14 / 245 seats (5.7%)
Against: 28 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 203
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 0 | No | This is complete nonsense; we won’t shoot at our own people. |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 14 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 0 | No | This is wrong. The bill enables police brutality and removing the oversight board allows for more coverups. We won't support this never |
| Red Green Labor | 28 | No | We reject this proposal our individual freedom is not for sale |
Federal-State Governor
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
President
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is complete nonsense; we won’t shoot at our own people.”
“We reject this proposal our individual freedom is not for sale”