Shifts nuclear policy from expansion to restraint, reducing global tensions and protecting public safety through credible no-first-use commitments.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuclear Weapons |
Expand the nuclear arsenal
|
Retain weapons, pledge no first use
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 543 seats (0.0%)
Against: 128 · Abstained: 228 · Not voted: 187
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca | 128 | No | This does not ensure the safety of our Republic. |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 0 | Yes | We support this bill fully and believe in the progress it can cause |
| Red Green Labor | 228 | Abstain | sorry but we cant support this bill |
For: 0 / 245 seats (0.0%)
Against: 14 · Abstained: 103 · Not voted: 128
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca | 14 | No | This does not ensure the safety of our Republic. |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 0 | Yes | We support this bill fully and believe in the progress it can cause |
| Red Green Labor | 103 | Abstain | sorry but we cant support this bill |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“sorry but we cant support this bill”
“we support this proposal”
“We support this bill fully and believe in the progress it can cause”
“This does not ensure the safety of our Republic.”