These changes strengthen national security and public safety by tightening control over firearms, identity verification, protests, arms exports, and nuclear deterrence.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firearms Control |
Licensed ownership with background checks
|
Strict licensing, limited categories
|
|
| 2 | National Identity Cards |
Mandatory ID card
|
Mandatory biometric ID + central register
|
|
| 3 | Right to Protest |
Unrestricted right to assemble
|
Right to protest with prior notice
|
|
| 4 | Arms Exports |
Sell arms with minimal restriction
|
Export only to close allies
|
|
| 5 | Nuclear Weapons |
Expand the nuclear arsenal
|
Maintain a minimal deterrent
|
Party
The party of relentless growth where ambition meets accountability. We build empires not shelters.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 44
A former banker who left finance to champion policies that reward effort and innovation, Philip Williams believes in pragmatic solutions over idealism—after all, numbers don’t lie.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 543 seats (0.0%)
Against: 272 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 271
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capitalists Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Nationalist Alliance | 0 | Abstain | We abstain this proposal. |
| Red Green Labor | 272 | No | We don't support this proposal it's against individual freedom |
| Socialist Labour Bloc | 0 | No | Even though we do not have a proper say in the Government, we still want to make it clear we do not stand with the limitation of protests which is inherently against our values. |
For: 0 / 245 seats (0.0%)
Against: 23 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 222
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capitalists Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Nationalist Alliance | 0 | Abstain | We abstain this proposal. |
| Red Green Labor | 23 | No | We don't support this proposal it's against individual freedom |
| Socialist Labour Bloc | 0 | No | Even though we do not have a proper say in the Government, we still want to make it clear we do not stand with the limitation of protests which is inherently against our values. |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We abstain this proposal.”
“Even though we do not have a proper say in the Government, we still want to make it clear we do not stand with the limitation of protests which is inherently against our values.”
“Even though we do not have a proper say in the Government, we still want to make it clear we do not stand with the limitation of protests which inherently against our values.”
“We don't support this proposal it's against individual freedom”