Javosca
Proposals
Marriage Reform Act of 2023

Legislative Bill · Javosca

Marriage Reform Act of 2023

Proposed by National Front Of Javosca

Opened

21 Dec 2023

Voting closes

19 Feb 2024

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

2 changes

Rationale

I, for one, believe it is time Javosca returns to a more traditionalist view of marriage. So help us God.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Adoption & Fostering	Any adult who passes assessment		Married couples only
2	Divorce Law	Quick no-fault divorce		Fault must be proven

1

Adoption & Fostering

Previous law

Any adult who passes assessment

Married couples only

2

Divorce Law

Previous law

Quick no-fault divorce

Fault must be proven

Timeline

Draft

21 December 2023
Vote Open

21 December 2023
Vote Closed

19 February 2024
Did Not Become Law

19 February 2024

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Congress

Failed

128Yes 250No 165Not voted 543 seats

For: 128 / 543 seats (23.6%)

Against: 250 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 165

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 33.9%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Javoscan Social Alliance "future"	0	No	This proposal deprives married couples of the right to divorce, which could lead to domestic violence and harm the mental health of the children of these couples. Overall, it is better to let people get divorced than to keep them bound by marriage.
National Front Of Javosca Proposer	128	Yes	No reason given
Peoples Progressional Front	0	No	This is awful for many reasons but im not gonna say them due to limited time. Short answer No
Red Green Labor	250	No	We reject this proposal

Senate

Failed

14Yes 28No 203Not voted 245 seats

For: 14 / 245 seats (5.7%)

Against: 28 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 203

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 33.3%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Javoscan Social Alliance "future"	0	No	This proposal deprives married couples of the right to divorce, which could lead to domestic violence and harm the mental health of the children of these couples. Overall, it is better to let people get divorced than to keep them bound by marriage.
National Front Of Javosca Proposer	14	Yes	No reason given
Peoples Progressional Front	0	No	This is awful for many reasons but im not gonna say them due to limited time. Short answer No
Red Green Labor	28	No	We reject this proposal

Federal-State Governor

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Red Green Labor	1	No	No reason given

President

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Red Green Labor	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Javoscan Social Alliance "future"

Voted Jan. 4, 2024

“This proposal deprives married couples of the right to divorce, which could lead to domestic violence and harm the mental health of the children of these couples. Overall, it is better to let people get divorced than to keep them bound by marriage.”

Peoples Progressional Front

Voted Dec. 27, 2023

“This is awful for many reasons but im not gonna say them due to limited time. Short answer No”

Red Green Labor

Voted Dec. 27, 2023

“We reject this proposal”