“Good enough, I approve.”
Lower Elders Priority Act of 2023
Rationale
The elderly take up so many resources for care and management. The country needs to think of the generations after not the generations before> The country needs workers and those who are young and sharp deserve the resources to consider working
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Veterans' Affairs |
Guaranteed housing, healthcare, pensions for veterans
|
Veterans use general public services
|
|
| 2 | Social Care for the Elderly |
Free universal social care
|
Care is the family's responsibility
|
|
| 3 | Assisted Dying Policy |
Broad right-to-die for chronic physical or psychological suffering
|
Over-80s encouraged to "consider the next generation" (state counselling programme)
|
1
Veterans' Affairs2
Social Care for the Elderly3
Assisted Dying PolicyProposer
Party
Peoples Progressional Front
The Peoples Progressional Front builds a better future by promising secure borders putting citizens first. We believe in support for business helping entrepreneurs grow their empires into kingdoms of perfection. We believe in deprioritizing the elderly so support for sharp and young minds can lead
Core pillars
Philippa Green
Candidate for Federal-State Governor · Age 56
A former corporate lawyer turned outsider politician, Philippa Green leveraged her street-smart instincts and idealism to rise from grassroots organizing to a leadership role, hungry to prove reform is possible from the outside.
Timeline
-
Draft13 October 2023
-
Vote Open13 October 2023
-
Vote Closed12 December 2023
-
Did Not Become Law12 December 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Congress
FailedFor: 128 / 543 seats (23.6%)
Against: 250 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 165
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Front Of Javosca | 128 | Yes | Good enough, I approve. |
| Peoples Progressional Front Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Green Labor | 250 | No | We reject this proposal |
Senate
FailedFor: 14 / 245 seats (5.7%)
Against: 28 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 203
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Front Of Javosca | 14 | Yes | Good enough, I approve. |
| Peoples Progressional Front Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Green Labor | 28 | No | We reject this proposal |
Federal-State Governor
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
President
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We reject this proposal”