These reforms remove rigid labor rules to boost economic flexibility, growth, and competitiveness while preserving fair contracts through negotiation.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maximum Working Hours |
Mandatory four-day work week (28 hours maximum)
|
No statutory limit on working hours
|
|
| 2 | Minimum Wage Policy |
Maximum wage cap (no one may earn more than 10x the lowest-paid worker)
|
No minimum wage
|
|
| 3 | Paid Annual Leave |
6+ weeks statutory paid leave
|
No statutory minimum; left to contract
|
|
| 4 | Paid Sick Leave |
State-funded sick pay from day one, employees and self-employed
|
No statutory sick leave
|
Party
The NFJ advocates for the protection of the national culture of our nation, the strengthening of the Executive and bringing back gentlemanry to our society through a strong platform.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 35
A 35-year-old policy wonk with a doctorate in political science, Nathaniel Smith entered activism after publishing a scathing critique of the government’s security policies, quickly gaining attention for his sharp media appearances and relentless climb up the political ranks.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 128 / 543 seats (23.6%)
Against: 250 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 165
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 0 | Yes | We vote YES, because our party advocates for complete market freedom in our country and is also opposed to restrictions on maximum wages. |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 128 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 0 | No | There is so many things wrong here. You are pretty much cutting workers rights to sick leave and allowing employers will be allowed to work people to the bone and not even pay minimum wage or sick leave. This does not help workers this gives employers many grounds for abuse |
| Red Green Labor | 250 | No | This law is against the labour and everything we stand for we reject this proposal |
For: 14 / 245 seats (5.7%)
Against: 28 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 203
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 0 | Yes | We vote YES, because our party advocates for complete market freedom in our country and is also opposed to restrictions on maximum wages. |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 14 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 0 | No | There is so many things wrong here. You are pretty much cutting workers rights to sick leave and allowing employers will be allowed to work people to the bone and not even pay minimum wage or sick leave. This does not help workers this gives employers many grounds for abuse |
| Red Green Labor | 28 | No | This law is against the labour and everything we stand for we reject this proposal |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We vote YES, because our party advocates for complete market freedom in our country and is also opposed to restrictions on maximum wages.”
“There is so many things wrong here. You are pretty much cutting workers rights to sick leave and allowing employers will be allowed to work people to the bone and not even pay minimum wage or sick leave. This does not help workers this gives employers many grounds for abuse”
“This law is against the labour and everything we stand for we reject this proposal”