These reforms address uncontrolled immigration that threatens our collective cultural values and ensures those that breach the law are duly removed from our soil.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asylum & Refugees |
Generous resettlement and support
|
"Asylum seekers are economic migrants" - asylum claims closed
|
|
| 2 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth; naturalisation after 2 years' residency
|
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
|
| 3 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Automatic removal, limited appeals
|
|
| 4 | Immigration Quota Policy |
No quotas, open immigration
|
Severely limited immigration
|
|
| 5 | Integration Requirements |
Light-touch, support-based integration
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
Party
The NFJ advocates for the protection of the national culture of our nation, the strengthening of the Executive and bringing back gentlemanry to our society through a strong platform.
Core pillars
Candidate for President · Age 37
A street-smart radical with a flair for the dramatic, Bernard Sinclair’s unshakable devotion to the cause and silver-tongued wit have turned skeptics into disciples, though his unpredictable antics keep even allies guessing.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 128 / 543 seats (23.6%)
Against: 250 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 165
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 128 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Green Labor | 250 | No | We reject this proposal immigration ia our strength |
| Together For Javosca | 0 | No | We say NO to this proposal; we reject this proposal because it is openly unconstitutional and infringes upon workers' rights |
For: 14 / 245 seats (5.7%)
Against: 28 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 203
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 14 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Green Labor | 28 | No | We reject this proposal immigration ia our strength |
| Together For Javosca | 0 | No | We say NO to this proposal; we reject this proposal because it is openly unconstitutional and infringes upon workers' rights |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We say NO to this proposal; we reject this proposal because it is openly unconstitutional and infringes upon workers' rights”
“We reject this proposal immigration ia our strength”