“Immigration deez nuts.”
Immigration Adjustment Act of 2023
Rationale
We need to put the people first and protect the border more firmly. Those that wish to move here from foreign lands must do so with heavy restrictions. In our mind you work to earn money why not work to citizenship.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizenship Requirements |
Automatic citizenship granted on arrival; no requirements whatsoever
|
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
|
| 2 | Integration Requirements |
No formal integration requirements
|
Standard language/civics requirements
|
|
| 3 | Deportation |
Strong protections against removal
|
Firm enforcement with appeals
|
|
| 4 | Asylum & Refugees |
Generous resettlement and support
|
Offshore processing and detention
|
1
Citizenship Requirements2
Integration Requirements3
Deportation4
Asylum & RefugeesProposer
Party
Peoples Progressional Front
The Peoples Progressional Front builds a better future by promising secure borders putting citizens first. We believe in support for business helping entrepreneurs grow their empires into kingdoms of perfection. We believe in deprioritizing the elderly so support for sharp and young minds can lead
Core pillars
Lawrence Young
Activist · Age 55
A data-obsessed networker who somehow offends half the room while brokering backroom deals, Lawrence Young’s street-smart pragmatism made him the party’s go-to fixer for impossible problems.
Timeline
-
Draft28 December 2023
-
Vote Open28 December 2023
-
Vote Closed26 February 2024
-
Did Not Become Law26 February 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Congress
FailedFor: 128 / 543 seats (23.6%)
Against: 250 · Abstained: 61 · Not voted: 104
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 61 | Abstain | We could vote YES, but we don’t believe that citizenship should be granted by right of blood; we agree with the other points. |
| National Front Of Javosca | 128 | Yes | Immigration deez nuts. |
| Peoples Progressional Front Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Green Labor | 250 | No | We reject this proposal jovosca is a land of immigrants build by the immigrants everyone is welcomed here |
Senate
FailedFor: 14 / 245 seats (5.7%)
Against: 28 · Abstained: 27 · Not voted: 176
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 27 | Abstain | We could vote YES, but we don’t believe that citizenship should be granted by right of blood; we agree with the other points. |
| National Front Of Javosca | 14 | Yes | Immigration deez nuts. |
| Peoples Progressional Front Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Green Labor | 28 | No | We reject this proposal jovosca is a land of immigrants build by the immigrants everyone is welcomed here |
Federal-State Governor
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
President
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Green Labor | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We could vote YES, but we don’t believe that citizenship should be granted by right of blood; we agree with the other points.”
“We reject this proposal jovosca is a land of immigrants build by the immigrants everyone is welcomed here”