Economy Deregulation Act of 2024 - Javosca

Rationale

These reforms remove barriers to competition and innovation, cutting costs for consumers while boosting productivity and economic growth through fully open markets.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous	Proposed
1	Agricultural Market Regime	Mixed regime: tariffs on some staples, intervention only in a crisis	No tariffs, marketing boards or price support of any kind
2	Online Retail & Marketplaces	Marketplaces liable for illegal or unsafe third-party goods; standard returns rights	Digital-first: e-signatures, no local-presence rules, open cross-border selling
3	Foreign Investment & Takeovers	Screening of sensitive sectors on national-security grounds	No restrictions on foreign investment or takeovers
4	Price-Gouging Regulation	Temporary price caps on essentials in declared emergencies	No restrictions; prices follow supply and demand, emergencies included
5	Retail Planning & Licensing	Planning permission required for large stores; otherwise open	No planning or licensing controls on retail at all

1

Agricultural Market Regime

Previous law

Mixed regime: tariffs on some staples, intervention only in a crisis

No tariffs, marketing boards or price support of any kind

2

Online Retail & Marketplaces

Previous law

Marketplaces liable for illegal or unsafe third-party goods; standard returns rights

Digital-first: e-signatures, no local-presence rules, open cross-border selling

3

Foreign Investment & Takeovers

Previous law

Screening of sensitive sectors on national-security grounds

No restrictions on foreign investment or takeovers

4

Price-Gouging Regulation

Previous law

Temporary price caps on essentials in declared emergencies

No restrictions; prices follow supply and demand, emergencies included

5

Retail Planning & Licensing

Previous law

Planning permission required for large stores; otherwise open

No planning or licensing controls on retail at all

Proposer

Party

National Front Of Javosca

The NFJ advocates for the protection of the national culture of our nation, the strengthening of the Executive and bringing back gentlemanry to our society through a strong platform.

Core pillars

Bernard Sinclair

Candidate for President · Age 37

133,829 social followers

A street-smart radical with a flair for the dramatic, Bernard Sinclair’s unshakable devotion to the cause and silver-tongued wit have turned skeptics into disciples, though his unpredictable antics keep even allies guessing.

🚀 Ambitious ✨ Charismatic 🎭 Eccentric 🤝 Loyal 🔨 Working Class Background

Timeline

Draft

23 October 2024
Vote Open

23 October 2024
Vote Closes

22 December 2024
Became Law

Not completed yet

You need an active party in this country to vote on proposals.

Vote tally

Currently passing

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Congress

Passing

141Yes 113No 228Abstained 61Not voted 543 seats

For: 141 / 543 seats (26.0%)

Against: 113 · Abstained: 228 · Not voted: 61

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 55.5%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Javoscan Social Alliance "future"	61	Not voted
National Front Of Javosca Proposer	141	Yes	No reason given
Peoples Progressional Front	113	No	Unfortunately i have to say no. I think some regulation is better than no regulation in the case of business growth. There has to be priority somewhere and that means regulation has to exist in many sectors. Providing no ground to stand on is a mistake economically and it often does show
Red Green Labor	228	Abstain	No reason given

Senate

Passing

64Yes 51No 103Abstained 27Not voted 245 seats

For: 64 / 245 seats (26.1%)

Against: 51 · Abstained: 103 · Not voted: 27

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 55.7%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Javoscan Social Alliance "future"	27	Not voted
National Front Of Javosca Proposer	64	Yes	No reason given
Peoples Progressional Front	51	No	Unfortunately i have to say no. I think some regulation is better than no regulation in the case of business growth. There has to be priority somewhere and that means regulation has to exist in many sectors. Providing no ground to stand on is a mistake economically and it often does show
Red Green Labor	103	Abstain	No reason given

Federal-State Governor

Passing

0Yes 0No 1Abstained 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 1 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Cordelia Johnson	1	Abstain	No reason given

President

Passing

0Yes 0No 1Abstained 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 1 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Elizabeth Davidson	1	Abstain	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Peoples Progressional Front

Voted Oct. 31, 2024

No

“Unfortunately i have to say no. I think some regulation is better than no regulation in the case of business growth. There has to be priority somewhere and that means regulation has to exist in many sectors. Providing no ground to stand on is a mistake economically and it often does show”

Red Green Labor

Voted Oct. 31, 2024

Abstain