Drug Enforcement Act of 2024
Rationale
Our people for too long have suffered from the ill effects of some of these hard substances. On order to build a today for everyone there has to be more regulation if we want to crack down on addiction and provide more accessible treatment to those struggling with the epidemic of addiction
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Psychedelics Policy |
Legal for medical / supervised use only
|
Full prohibition; possession criminalised, prison for repeat offences
|
|
| 2 | Stimulants Policy |
Legal, licensed, regulated retail
|
Full prohibition; possession criminalised, prison for repeat offences
|
|
| 3 | Drug Treatment & Harm Reduction |
Needle exchanges, safe consumption rooms, opioid substitution
|
Publicly funded treatment on demand
|
|
| 4 | Tobacco & Vaping Regulation |
No restrictions on tobacco sales or use (no age limit, no warnings)
|
Light regulation (age 18, designated smoking areas, health warnings)
|
1
Psychedelics Policy2
Stimulants Policy3
Drug Treatment & Harm Reduction4
Tobacco & Vaping RegulationProposer
Party
Peoples Progressional Front
The Peoples Progressional Front builds a better future by promising secure borders putting citizens first. We believe in support for business helping entrepreneurs grow their empires into kingdoms of perfection. We believe in deprioritizing the elderly so support for sharp and young minds can lead
Core pillars
Lawrence Young
Activist · Age 55
A data-obsessed networker who somehow offends half the room while brokering backroom deals, Lawrence Young’s street-smart pragmatism made him the party’s go-to fixer for impossible problems.
Timeline
-
Draft10 June 2024
-
Vote Open10 June 2024
-
Vote Closed9 August 2024
-
Did Not Become Law9 August 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Congress
PassedFor: 254 / 543 seats (46.8%)
Against: 228 · Abstained: 61 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 61 | Abstain | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca | 141 | Yes | We support this proposal. |
| National Republican Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front Proposer | 113 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Green Labor | 228 | No | We reject this proposal |
Senate
PassedFor: 115 / 245 seats (46.9%)
Against: 103 · Abstained: 27 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 27 | Abstain | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca | 64 | Yes | We support this proposal. |
| National Republican Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front Proposer | 51 | Yes | No reason given |
| Red Green Labor | 103 | No | We reject this proposal |
Federal-State Governor
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cordelia Johnson | 1 | No | No reason given |
President
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Davidson | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support this proposal.”
“We reject this proposal”