These reforms modernize justice with efficiency, victim empowerment, and personal freedom—cutting costs while protecting rights and safety through trust, not compulsion.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plea Bargaining |
Regulated: sentence discount capped, judge must approve
|
Encouraged: prosecutors may offer deep discounts for early guilty pleas
|
|
| 2 | Victims' Rights |
Right to be informed and to make an impact statement
|
Victims are formal participants, heard on plea, sentence and parole
|
|
| 3 | Police Search & Seizure |
Reasonable suspicion required; warrant needed for homes and devices
|
Judicial warrant needed for all searches and seizures except emergencies
|
|
| 4 | Driver Licensing & Testing |
Standard test with a probationary period for new drivers
|
One basic test; licence valid for life
|
|
| 5 | Seatbelts & Helmets |
Seatbelts and motorcycle helmets compulsory
|
No mandates; use is entirely a personal choice
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 543 / 543 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 61 | Yes | We support almost everything in this proposal except for point 5, which, overall, is not that significant compared to the other points. |
| National Front Of Javosca | 141 | Yes | We approve this bill! |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 113 | Yes | As a party with rehabilitation as one of our cores there is a lot here that we like looking at this bill. We agree to not everything but a good majority of the bill enough to say yes |
| Red Green Labor Proposer | 228 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 245 / 245 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 27 | Yes | We support almost everything in this proposal except for point 5, which, overall, is not that significant compared to the other points. |
| National Front Of Javosca | 64 | Yes | We approve this bill! |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 51 | Yes | As a party with rehabilitation as one of our cores there is a lot here that we like looking at this bill. We agree to not everything but a good majority of the bill enough to say yes |
| Red Green Labor Proposer | 103 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cordelia Johnson Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Davidson Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support almost everything in this proposal except for point 5, which, overall, is not that significant compared to the other points.”
“As a party with rehabilitation as one of our cores there is a lot here that we like looking at this bill. We agree to not everything but a good majority of the bill enough to say yes”
“We approve this bill!”