“We can't grow as a country if consumer spending is attacked. This does just that and makes the economy falter. It doesn't help business and it certainly doesn't help consumers”
Consumer Goods Protection Reform of 2024
Rationale
The goal of our proposal is to leave consumers with roughly the same rights as before, while slightly relieving the market of obligations.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consumer Protection |
Multi-year warranties, no-quibble refunds for faulty goods, enforced safety standards
|
Statutory refund/replace for faulty goods within a set period; basic safety standards
|
1
Consumer ProtectionTimeline
-
Draft28 August 2024
-
Vote Open28 August 2024
-
Vote Closed27 October 2024
-
Did Not Become Law27 October 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Congress
FailedFor: 202 / 543 seats (37.2%)
Against: 341 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" Proposer | 61 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca | 141 | Yes | We approve of this act, it will splurt economic growth. |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 113 | No | We can't grow as a country if consumer spending is attacked. This does just that and makes the economy falter. It doesn't help business and it certainly doesn't help consumers |
| Red Green Labor | 228 | No | This bill is direct attack on the public spending we reject this proposal for that reason |
Senate
FailedFor: 91 / 245 seats (37.1%)
Against: 154 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" Proposer | 27 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca | 64 | Yes | We approve of this act, it will splurt economic growth. |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 51 | No | We can't grow as a country if consumer spending is attacked. This does just that and makes the economy falter. It doesn't help business and it certainly doesn't help consumers |
| Red Green Labor | 103 | No | This bill is direct attack on the public spending we reject this proposal for that reason |
Federal-State Governor
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cordelia Johnson | 1 | No | No reason given |
President
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Davidson | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We approve of this act, it will splurt economic growth.”
“This bill is direct attack on the public spending we reject this proposal for that reason”