Proposed by National Front Of Javosca · Voting closes 26 Dec 2024
The purpose of this budget is increasing our national reserves.
This will increase tax take by $207.8bn annually.
This will decrease total budgeted spending by $245.0bn annually.
This will increase the annual surplus from $79.1bn to $531.9bn.
Checked against the same test used when a budget passes. Nothing here is decided until the vote closes.
This budget leaves the demand untouched. Short by $607 per person — $59.4bn a year more is needed.
Short by $7936 per person — $776.9bn a year more is needed.
Every line of the budget as it would stand if this passes. Rows that change show the budget currently in force the new value.
| Earning band | Tax rate | Tax take |
|---|---|---|
| Personal income tax: Low earners | 10% 15% | $85.7bn $128.6bn |
| Personal income tax: Medium earners | 17% 20% | $221.8bn $260.9bn |
| Personal income tax: High earners | 38% 40% | $1,297.6bn $1,365.9bn |
| Personal income tax: Elite earners | 40% 45% | $460.0bn $517.5bn |
| Total tax take | $2,065.1bn $2,272.9bn |
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $1,124 $919 | $110.0bn $90.0bn | |
| Retirement | $2,962 $2,656 | $290.0bn $260.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $3,575 $3,064 | $350.0bn $300.0bn | |
| Education | $2,860 $2,554 | $280.0bn $250.0bn | |
| Housing | $817 $613 | $80.0bn $60.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $460 | $45.0bn | |
| Defence | $153 | $15.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $255 $51 | $25.0bn $5.0bn | |
| Business Support | $1,021 | $100.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $613 $306 | $60.0bn $30.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $1 | $0.1bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $492 $306 | $48.2bn $30.0bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $394 $306 | $38.6bn $30.0bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $295 $204 | $28.9bn $20.0bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $197 $102 | $19.3bn $10.0bn | |
| Total | $1,490.1bn $1,245.1bn |
For: 115 / 245 filled seats (46.9%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 103 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 27
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 27 | Not voted | |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 64 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 51 | Yes | We need to keep the voters trust on our side and if they demand an increase than an increase is necessary. We do not want voters to bite us in the next election over a missed promise so its important to deliver we think they are demanding in a timely matter |
| Red Green Labor | 103 | No | This budget is not good it's increasing massive taxes on the working class and also cutting the subsidies they are getting |
For: 254 / 543 filled seats (46.8%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 228 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 61
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 61 | Not voted | |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 141 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 113 | Yes | We need to keep the voters trust on our side and if they demand an increase than an increase is necessary. We do not want voters to bite us in the next election over a missed promise so its important to deliver we think they are demanding in a timely matter |
| Red Green Labor | 228 | No | This budget is not good it's increasing massive taxes on the working class and also cutting the subsidies they are getting |
A budget passes once every legislature reaches its threshold, and fails immediately if a majority votes against. If neither happens, it resolves when voting closes.
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This budget is not good it's increasing massive taxes on the working class and also cutting the subsidies they are getting”
“We need to keep the voters trust on our side and if they demand an increase than an increase is necessary. We do not want voters to bite us in the next election over a missed promise so its important to deliver we think they are demanding in a timely matter”