“We support this proposal”
Reorganization of Government Priorities Act
Proposed by National Front Of Javosca · Passed 2 Oct 2022
Rationale
It is the people's demand to increase the healthcare budget, which we are providing with this bill. Additionally, every other department gets a relatively massive increase, which will make the size of the state apparatus swell bigger.
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
Annual Spending
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $1,124 $1,532 | $110.0bn $150.0bn | |
| Retirement | $2,962 $3,064 | $290.0bn $300.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $3,575 $10,214 | $350.0bn $1,000.0bn | |
| Education | $2,860 $3,064 | $280.0bn $300.0bn | |
| Housing | $817 $1,021 | $80.0bn $100.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $460 $1,430 | $45.0bn $140.0bn | |
| Defence | $184 $1,430 | $18.0bn $140.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $255 $511 | $25.0bn $50.0bn | |
| Business Support | $1,021 $1,532 | $100.0bn $150.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $409 $613 | $40.0bn $60.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $1 $511 | $0.1bn $50.0bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $492 $547 | $48.2bn $53.6bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $394 $438 | $38.6bn $42.9bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $295 $328 | $28.9bn $32.1bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $197 $219 | $19.3bn $21.4bn | |
| Total | $1,473.1bn $2,590.0bn |
Vote tally
Senate
PassedFor: 26 / 42 filled seats (61.9%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 27 | Not voted | |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 10 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 51 | Not voted | |
| Red Green Labor | 16 | Yes | We support this proposal |
Congress
PassedFor: 239 / 378 filled seats (63.2%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 139
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 61 | Not voted | |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 91 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 113 | Not voted | |
| Red Green Labor | 148 | Yes | We support this proposal |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is not the ideal budget we want”