“..........................”
Healthcare Access Act of 2024
Rationale
These changes ensure affordable, universal access to essential medicines, food safety, and healthcare by removing profit barriers and guaranteeing rights.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Drug Patents & Generics |
Standard patent term; generics on expiry and pharmacist substitution allowed
|
No patents on medicines; any manufacturer may make any drug
|
|
| 2 | Food Safety Regulation |
Regular risk-based inspection and mandatory recalls
|
Strict standards, unannounced inspections and published hygiene ratings
|
|
| 3 | Vaccination Policy |
Strongly recommended, not compelled
|
Mandatory, no exemptions
|
|
| 4 | Mental Health Provision |
Expanded but not guaranteed access
|
Legal right to timely mental-health care
|
|
| 5 | Prescription Drug Pricing |
Voluntary pricing agreements with industry
|
Statutory price caps on all medicines
|
1
Drug Patents & Generics2
Food Safety Regulation3
Vaccination Policy4
Mental Health Provision5
Prescription Drug PricingProposer
Party
Socialist Worker's Union
The Socialist Worker's Union will fight for a green future with workplace democracy, a large welfare system, personal freedom, and large wealth redistribution. We are also in support for LGBTQ, open borders, and feminism.
Core pillars
Olivier Martinez
Activist · Age 54
A self-taught economist from a working-class background, Olivier Martinez abandoned a lucrative corporate career to fight for wealth redistribution, leveraging his sharp analytical mind and street-smart instincts to rise quickly in political circles.
Timeline
-
Draft21 July 2024
-
Vote Open9 August 2024
-
Vote Closed8 October 2024
-
Became Law8 October 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Ducal Council
PassedFor: 70 / 102 seats (68.6%)
Against: 10 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 22
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| GrandDuxh | 0 | Yes | .......................... |
| Moderate Conservative Union | 10 | No | Although we don't see negatively on point 1, 4, and 5, we belive that points 2, and 3 intervene too much with the lives of the people, even though we encourage both, we do not feel qualified to force the people, the choice should be, in the end, up to them. |
| Socialist Worker's Union Proposer | 40 | Yes | No reason given |
| Valmoire Worker`s Congres | 30 | Yes | This is a common sense proposal for the common good |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Although we don't see negatively on point 1, 4, and 5, we belive that points 2, and 3 intervene too much with the lives of the people, even though we encourage both, we do not feel qualified to force the people, the choice should be, in the end, up to them.”
“This is a common sense proposal for the common good”