“Are you serious? We don’t agree to anything”
Fuchs Social Law of 2022
Rationale
These reforms aim to address archaic drug and natal policies to reduce harm and improve public health.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Depressants Policy |
Full prohibition; possession criminalised, prison for repeat offences
|
Legal for medical / supervised use only
|
|
| 2 | Stimulants Policy |
Full prohibition; possession criminalised, prison for repeat offences
|
Possession decriminalised; treatment-led
|
|
| 3 | Parental Leave Policy |
Shared, non-transferable parental leave (use-it-or-lose-it for each parent)
|
State-mandated reproduction targets; penalties for childless couples
|
1
Depressants Policy2
Stimulants Policy3
Parental Leave PolicyProposer
Party
Ecologist And Social-Liberal Union
We believe in the transformative power of the youth and of a sustainable future where freedom blooms with wildflowers and a liberated people breathe with the trees.
Core pillars
Moritz Fuchs
Activist · Age 26
Moritz Fuchs dropped out of university to organise grassroots campaigns, leveraging his broad network of activists and entrepreneurs—though his blunt honesty and lack of oratory skills often land him in heated debates he can’t win.
Timeline
-
Draft14 April 2022
-
Vote Open14 April 2022
-
Vote Closed13 June 2022
-
Did Not Become Law13 June 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Rikstag
FailedFor: 168 / 349 seats (48.1%)
Against: 743 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Democratic Alliance | 244 | No | We do not agree with a singular part of this bill. Having a child policy as well, is INCREDIBLY weird and against personal autonomy. |
| Ecologist And Social-Liberal Union Proposer | 168 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Democrats | 245 | No | the third article is pretty harsh ngl |
| RISET | 82 | No | We can't accept the third article |
| Reformist Sovereignists | 172 | No | Are you serious? We don’t agree to anything |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We can't accept the third article”
“the third article is pretty harsh ngl”
“We do not agree with a singular part of this bill. Having a child policy as well, is INCREDIBLY weird and against personal autonomy.”