“Bourgeois degeneracy!”
Experimental Economics Act of 2021
Rationale
These reforms remove outdated restrictions, boosting economic freedom, consumer choice, and individual rights while ensuring public safety through market-driven standards.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sex Work |
Selling legal, buying criminalised
|
Fully decriminalised and regulated
|
|
| 2 | Adult Content |
Heavily restricted distribution
|
Unrestricted adult content
|
|
| 3 | Animal Welfare Standards |
Strict welfare (ban factory farming; mandatory free-range; fur farming banned)
|
No animal welfare laws whatsoever
|
|
| 4 | Shop Trading Hours |
Limited Sunday opening hours
|
Unrestricted trading every day
|
|
| 5 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
Full privatisation, market discipline
|
1
Sex Work2
Adult Content3
Animal Welfare Standards4
Shop Trading Hours5
Public Ownership of Key IndustriesProposer
Party
Liberal Democrats
We believe in markets that thrive without chains and people who live without limits. Secular by design, unshackled by dogma.
Core pillars
Hans Schröder
Activist · Age 45
Hans Schröder traded a lucrative corporate consulting career for politics after delivering a viral speech on individual liberty, quickly becoming the party’s most sought-after speaker and policy architect.
Timeline
-
Draft11 January 2021
-
Vote Open5 May 2021
-
Vote Closed4 July 2021
-
Did Not Become Law4 July 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Rikstag
FailedFor: 270 / 349 seats (77.4%)
Against: 645 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Radical Federation | 217 | No | Animal rights being thrown in this bill is like putting a nugget of arsenic in a sandwich. |
| Ecologist And Social-Liberal Union | 74 | No | While there are movements in this bill that we could support, the end of animalian protections is objectionable and a NON-STARTER. |
| Gothic Socialist Group | 296 | No | We can not in good conscience vote yes due to previsions 3,4,5 |
| Liberal Democrats Proposer | 270 | Yes | No reason given |
| National Marxist People's League | 58 | No | Bourgeois degeneracy! |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We can not in good conscience vote yes due to previsions 3,4,5”
“While there are movements in this bill that we could support, the end of animalian protections is objectionable and a NON-STARTER.”
“Animal rights being thrown in this bill is like putting a nugget of arsenic in a sandwich.”