“We support this for a better healthcare system”
Controlled Substances Policy Reform of 2023
Rationale
Prohibition fuels addiction and crime; regulated medical/supervised use reduces harm and improves public health outcomes.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Depressants Policy |
Full prohibition; possession criminalised, prison for repeat offences
|
Legal for medical / supervised use only
|
|
| 2 | Stimulants Policy |
Full prohibition; possession criminalised, prison for repeat offences
|
Legal for medical / supervised use only
|
|
| 3 | Psychedelics Policy |
Legal for medical / supervised use only
|
Legal for medical / supervised use only
|
1
Depressants Policy2
Stimulants Policy3
Psychedelics PolicyProposer
Party
RISET
Our party's goal is to create a secular, social, and free state.
Core pillars
Emilia Schmidt
Federal Minister of commerce · Age 46
A decorated lieutenant who transitioned from military strategy to political warfare, Emilia Schmidt parlayed her elite education and defense-industry contacts into a reputation as a ruthlessly ambitious strategist, shaping both policy and public opinion.
Timeline
-
Draft6 June 2023
-
Vote Open5 July 2023
-
Vote Closed3 September 2023
-
Became Law3 September 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Rikstag
PassedFor: 753 / 349 seats (215.8%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Götademokraterna | 69 | Yes | We support this for the benefit of the public health |
| Götapartiet | 150 | Yes | Götapartiet support this. |
| Konservativa | 143 | Yes | We support this for a better healthcare system |
| RISET Proposer | 89 | Yes | No reason given |
| Vänster | 254 | Yes | We support this policy reform as this will support public health. |
| Vänsterpartiet | 48 | Yes | We support this as this will be good for public health. |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support this for the benefit of the public health”
“We support this policy reform as this will support public health.”
“We support this as this will be good for public health.”
“Götapartiet support this.”