“We support a middle ground for AI development, mostly concern to environmental and intellectual property concerns.”
Balanced AI Development Act of 2021
Rationale
CDA proposed an amendment imposing strict limitations on artificial intelligence research. Imposing strict limitations on AI could harm the country's economy in the long term, so with this bill, our party will both prevent this and protect our country from the threats posed by artificial intelligenc
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI Development & Safety |
Strict licensing, safety audits, liability
|
Balanced oversight
|
1
AI Development & SafetyProposer
Party
RISET
Our party's goal is to create a secular, social, and free state.
Core pillars
Sabine Schwarz
Activist · Age 46
A data-driven power broker with ties to both corporate boards and parliamentary backrooms, Sabine Schwarz rose through the ranks by turning raw numbers into compelling arguments and never forgetting a favor.
Timeline
-
Draft4 September 2021
-
Vote Open4 September 2021
-
Vote Closed3 November 2021
-
Did Not Become Law3 November 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Rikstag
FailedFor: 333 / 349 seats (95.4%)
Against: 442 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Democratic Alliance | 61 | No | Our party is against the pushing of AI without proper regulation. |
| Democratic Radical Federation | 0 | Abstain | We will abstain, as the pending proposal put forward by the CDA is considered by our leadership to have sufficient oversight and merit as opposed to this laxer regime. |
| Ecologist And Social-Liberal Union | 113 | Yes | We support a middle ground for AI development, mostly concern to environmental and intellectual property concerns. |
| Gothic Socialist Group | 190 | Yes | Responsible regulation for yet unproven AI |
| Liberal Democrats | 381 | No | isn't this contradicting your policy platform tho? |
| RISET Proposer | 30 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We will abstain, as the pending proposal put forward by the CDA is considered by our leadership to have sufficient oversight and merit as opposed to this laxer regime.”
“Our party is against the pushing of AI without proper regulation.”
“Responsible regulation for yet unproven AI”
“isn't this contradicting your policy platform tho?”