“Recreational marijuana is something we disagree with, but the medical effects of such a substance are widely studied and proven. Using drugs is against our religion, but medicine is not!”
Anti-drug act of 2021
Rationale
Shifts focus to medical access, reducing youth exposure and public safety risks from recreational use while ensuring safe, regulated treatment for patients.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marijuana Policy |
Legalization (age 21; licensed retail; THC tax; roadside impairment tests)
|
Medical-only (prescription/caregiver card; licensed dispensaries)
|
1
Marijuana PolicyProposer
Party
Reformist Sovereignists
The reformist want a nation where pragmatism and realism overcome ideologies, reforming, efficiency and national interest first
Core pillars
Katrin Werner
Activist · Age 50
A former investigative journalist turned activist, she leverages her media savvy to expose corruption and rally public opinion behind a values-driven movement.
Timeline
-
Draft10 December 2021
-
Vote Open10 December 2021
-
Vote Closed8 February 2022
-
Became Law8 February 2022
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Rikstag
PassedFor: 477 / 349 seats (136.7%)
Against: 457 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Democratic Alliance | 127 | Yes | Recreational marijuana is something we disagree with, but the medical effects of such a substance are widely studied and proven. Using drugs is against our religion, but medicine is not! |
| Democratic Radical Federation | 148 | No | It is the right of any free adult to engage in substances so far that it does not endanger others. |
| Gothic Socialist Group | 265 | No | Regressive backward thinking regulation of a substance that is already legal and in use. |
| Liberal Democrats | 350 | Yes | seems fair - the substance is weirdly anti-ambition |
| RISET | 44 | No | our party made marijuana legal we do not plan to change it |
| Reformist Sovereignists Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“It is the right of any free adult to engage in substances so far that it does not endanger others.”
“our party made marijuana legal we do not plan to change it”
“seems fair - the substance is weirdly anti-ambition”
“Regressive backward thinking regulation of a substance that is already legal and in use.”