Sensible Justice Overhaul Act of 2023
Rationale
These changes modernize justice to better protect children’s development and human rights while aligning with global standards for dignity and prevention of cruelty. Kids need better guidance and not immediate prison sentences. We restrict capital and corporal punishments even further.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Age of Criminal Responsibility |
From 16
|
From age 14
|
|
| 2 | Capital Punishment |
Death penalty constitutionally prohibited; extradition refused to countries that use it
|
Death penalty constitutionally prohibited; extradition refused to countries that use it
|
|
| 3 | Corporal Punishment |
Constitutional ban on all physical punishment including by parents at home
|
Constitutional ban on all physical punishment including by parents at home
|
1
Age of Criminal Responsibility2
Capital Punishment3
Corporal PunishmentProposer
Party
Democratic Liberal Platform
A forward-looking centrist party committed to protecting personal freedoms, boosting trust in public institutions and building an economy where everyone can thrive. By prioritizing bold investments in education and innovation, we secure lasting opportunities and prosperity for all citizens.
Core pillars
Jan Lund
Activist · Age 54
A former university economist with a penchant for unorthodox public stunts, Jan Lund leveraged his sharp policy mind and tangled web of elite contacts to rewrite the party’s education reform blueprint—and occasionally shock its more conventional members.
Timeline
-
Draft7 September 2023
-
Vote Open1 November 2023
-
Vote Closed31 December 2023
-
Became Law31 December 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Nordting
PassedFor: 17 / 35 seats (48.6%)
Against: 15 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 3
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Better Fjordheim | 8 | No | We support a justice system that protects children and treats young offenders responsibly, but this bill goes beyond necessary reform. Fjordheim already prohibits the death penalty and corporal punishment in its justice system and schools. Constitutionalising further restrictions, including direct state regulation of parental discipline in the home, represents a significant expansion of government authority. Raising the age of criminal responsibility to 14 deserves consideration on its own merits, but these separate issues should not be bundled together into a single overhaul. |
| ASTER | 7 | No | We welcome the stronger stand on the death penalty here — constitutional protection paired with refusing extradition goes further than what we achieved. But this bill would also lower the age of criminal responsibility from sixteen back to fourteen, undoing the very heart of what our own Justice Through Dignity Act was built to change. We can't trade away a child's right to be treated as a child for a gain on a different article. ASTER votes No, and would gladly support a version of this bill that left that particular line alone. |
| Democratic Liberal Platform Proposer | 3 | Yes | No reason given |
| Movement For Socialism | 14 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Socialist Union Of Workers | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support this proposal”
“We support a justice system that protects children and treats young offenders responsibly, but this bill goes beyond necessary reform. Fjordheim already prohibits the death penalty and corporal punishment in its justice system and schools. Constitutionalising further restrictions, including direct state regulation of parental discipline in the home, represents a significant expansion of government authority. Raising the age of criminal responsibility to 14 deserves consideration on its own merits, but these separate issues should not be bundled together into a single overhaul.”
“We welcome the stronger stand on the death penalty here — constitutional protection paired with refusing extradition goes further than what we achieved. But this bill would also lower the age of criminal responsibility from sixteen back to fourteen, undoing the very heart of what our own Justice Through Dignity Act was built to change. We can't trade away a child's right to be treated as a child for a gain on a different article. ASTER votes No, and would gladly support a version of this bill that left that particular line alone.”