“This is outrageous! This leads to risks like the capitalist class attempting to secure a cheap labor pool, undermine domestic labor standards, and weaken the power of local unions and diluting our culture!”
Multiculturalism and Belonging Act of 2023
Rationale
Fjordheim opens its doors: no immigration quotas, generous resettlement for refugees, integration built on support rather than tests, faster paths to citizenship, and strong protection from removal. A nation grows stronger by welcoming who it can become.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Immigration Quota Policy |
Annual quotas with caps
|
No quotas, open immigration
|
|
| 2 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Generous resettlement and support
|
|
| 3 | Integration Requirements |
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Light-touch, support-based integration
|
|
| 4 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
Citizenship by birth; naturalisation after 2 years' residency
|
|
| 5 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Strong protections against removal
|
1
Immigration Quota Policy2
Asylum & Refugees3
Integration Requirements4
Citizenship Requirements5
DeportationProposer
Party
ASTER
ASTER believes no person's dignity should be bargained away. In Fjordheim, we choose dialogue over division, solidarity over isolation, and the stubborn hope that different people can share one future.
Core pillars
Frida Nygård
Activist · Age 46
Frida Nygård rose from local activist to media darling thanks to her razor-sharp rhetoric and uncanny ability to spin even the most controversial causes into moral imperatives.
Timeline
-
Draft7 September 2023
-
Vote Open7 September 2023
-
Vote Closed6 November 2023
-
Became Law6 November 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Nordting
PassedFor: 21 / 35 seats (60.0%)
Against: 14 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Better Fjordheim | 8 | No | Our party fully supports humane treatment of refugees and fair opportunities for legal immigrants, but this bill goes too far by removing immigration limits, weakening integration requirements, shortening naturalisation to just two years, and making removal significantly harder. Immigration should remain orderly and sustainable, with meaningful language and civic integration so newcomers can fully participate in a shared Fjordheimer national community. |
| ASTER Proposer | 7 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Liberal Platform | 3 | No | The removal of quotas and leaving borders open fully open without any possibility to restrain the number of people coming in is not something we agree with. Immigration can definitely be a good thing and we do not want to close our borders, but we need the ability to course correct when public services buckle under the weight of a big influx of users. We are also opposed to looser integration requirements. We need newcomers to learn the language and our norms and values so they can participate more quickly and fully in our society. This is better for everyone. |
| Fjordheim National Solidarist Front | 3 | No | This is outrageous! This leads to risks like the capitalist class attempting to secure a cheap labor pool, undermine domestic labor standards, and weaken the power of local unions and diluting our culture! |
| Movement For Socialism | 14 | Yes | We support this our country is the land of immigrants built by the immigrants we fully back this proposal |
| Socialist Union Of Workers | 0 | Yes | We have a duty to protect and help immigrants and asylum seekers. Immigrants will be much more motivated to take part in society if it is easier. |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We have a duty to protect and help immigrants and asylum seekers. Immigrants will be much more motivated to take part in society if it is easier.”
“Our party fully supports humane treatment of refugees and fair opportunities for legal immigrants, but this bill goes too far by removing immigration limits, weakening integration requirements, shortening naturalisation to just two years, and making removal significantly harder. Immigration should remain orderly and sustainable, with meaningful language and civic integration so newcomers can fully participate in a shared Fjordheimer national community.”
“We support this our country is the land of immigrants built by the immigrants we fully back this proposal”
“The removal of quotas and leaving borders open fully open without any possibility to restrain the number of people coming in is not something we agree with. Immigration can definitely be a good thing and we do not want to close our borders, but we need the ability to course correct when public services buckle under the weight of a big influx of users. We are also opposed to looser integration requirements. We need newcomers to learn the language and our norms and values so they can participate more quickly and fully in our society. This is better for everyone.”