Legislative Bill · Fjordheim
Failed

Labor Market Liberalization Act of 2024

Proposed by Democratic Liberal Platform · fronted by Lærke Lund
Failing
in the Nordting
Opened
18 Apr 2024
Voting closes
17 Jun 2024
Chambers
1 legislature
Articles
2 changes

Rationale

The mandatory 4-day workweek is stifling for workers who want to work more. We need economic activity and not public control over industries. These changes modernize labor and economic policies to balance flexibility and growth while protecting workers and consumers through reasonable safeguards.

Proposed Changes

1

Maximum Working Hours
Previous law
Mandatory four-day work week (28 hours maximum)
48-hour weekly maximum

2

Public Ownership of Key Industries
Previous law
Public ownership of natural monopolies
Private, with strong regulation

Timeline

  • Draft
    18 April 2024


  • Vote Open
    18 April 2024


  • Vote Closed
    17 June 2024


  • Did Not Become Law
    17 June 2024

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Nordting

Failed
13Yes 20No 2Not voted 35 seats

For: 13 / 35 seats (37.1%)

Against: 20 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 2

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 39.4%)
Party Seats Vote
A Better Fjordheim 6 Yes
ASTER 20 No
Democratic Liberal Platform Proposer 5 Yes
Libertarian Alliance 2 Yes

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

ASTER
Voted June 4, 2024
No

“ASTER cannot support this bill. Doubling the maximum work week from 28 to 48 hours does not expand freedom — it removes a hard-won protection and shifts the balance of power back toward employers, at the expense of the workers this chamber exists to serve. Flexibility for those who wish to work more can be achieved without dismantling the standard that protects everyone else, including those with less leverage to say no. On the second provision, ASTER is not opposed in principle to private ownership under strong regulation — but "rigorous regulation" is not defined here, and we will not trade a public safeguard for a promise. Economic growth and worker dignity are not opposites; they require deliberate policy, not blanket deregulation dressed as modernization. ASTER remains open to a revised proposal that protects both flexibility and the people it affects most.”

Yes

“Economic growth requires flexibility and competition. Workers and businesses should be free to determine working arrangements within reasonable limits, while essential industries can be privately operated under strong public regulation.”

?
Game Wiki
Feature Roadmap
Bug report