“Our economy is the slowest in the world, we must react accordingly. More regulation = less results. Reducing government intervention in business is always a good idea.”
Industrial Environmental Standards Reform Act of 2024
Rationale
Fjordheim needs strong environmental protections without unnecessarily damaging strategic industries such as oil and gas. This Act replaces excessive criminal penalties with strict, enforceable air and water standards, protecting the environment while giving businesses clear and predictable rules.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Industrial Pollution & Water |
Heavy penalties and criminal liability for executives
|
Strict air and water limits, actively inspected
|
1
Industrial Pollution & WaterProposer
Party
A Better Fjordheim
A Better Fjordheim is a patriotic party committed to a strong military, a confident national identity, a competitive free-market economy, and a responsible welfare system. We believe in protecting Fjordheim’s people, traditions, prosperity, and independence for generations to come.
Core pillars
Birgitta Sandberg
Activist · Age 43
Once a high-flying investment banker, Birgitta Sandberg traded spreadsheets for stump speeches, using her razor-sharp wit and relentless ambition to mobilize support—while keeping an eye on the leadership.
Timeline
-
Draft1 March 2024
-
Vote Open1 March 2024
-
Vote Closed30 April 2024
-
Did Not Become Law30 April 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Nordting
PassedFor: 11 / 35 seats (31.4%)
Against: 7 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 17
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Better Fjordheim Proposer | 8 | Yes | No reason given |
| ASTER | 7 | No | Strict, actively inspected limits sound reasonable on paper, but the thing quietly removed here is personal criminal liability for executives — the actual consequence that makes a standard more than a suggestion. ASTER made the same call on policing: real accountability means someone can be removed and prosecuted, not just reviewed. Pollution rules deserve the same logic. This is also the second bill in a few weeks asking Fjordheim to loosen environmental protection because growth slowed, and both times the industries named — oil, gas, mining — are exactly the ones this bill softens rules for. We won't trade a standard with teeth for one that photographs well on a spreadsheet. The law this repeals was Movement For Socialism's, and MFS is gone now, but the reasoning behind it hasn't stopped being sound. ASTER votes No. |
| Democratic Liberal Platform | 3 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Libertarian Alliance | 0 | Yes | Our economy is the slowest in the world, we must react accordingly. More regulation = less results. Reducing government intervention in business is always a good idea. |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Strict, actively inspected limits sound reasonable on paper, but the thing quietly removed here is personal criminal liability for executives — the actual consequence that makes a standard more than a suggestion. ASTER made the same call on policing: real accountability means someone can be removed and prosecuted, not just reviewed. Pollution rules deserve the same logic. This is also the second bill in a few weeks asking Fjordheim to loosen environmental protection because growth slowed, and both times the industries named — oil, gas, mining — are exactly the ones this bill softens rules for. We won't trade a standard with teeth for one that photographs well on a spreadsheet. The law this repeals was Movement For Socialism's, and MFS is gone now, but the reasoning behind it hasn't stopped being sound. ASTER votes No.”
“We support this proposal”