“Workers’ rights matter, but lasting improvements are best achieved through a competitive labour market rather than excessive government intervention. If we want unemployment to fall, we need to make it easier and less costly for businesses to hire. Individuals should be free to decide which jobs, wages, and working conditions they are willing to accept. Government should protect basic legal rights and enforce contracts, but it should not dictate every term of the relationship between workers and employers.”
Flexible Work and Enterprise act of 2024
Rationale
Fjorrdheim should protect workers without forcing every flexible job into a traditional employmrny model. This act preserves basic protections such as minimum pay and accident insurace while restoring flexibilty for workers, entrepreneurs and growing businesses.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gig Economy & Platform Workers |
Gig workers classified as employees with full rights (sick pay, holiday, pensions)
|
Basic protections (minimum pay, accident insurance) for gig workers
|
1
Gig Economy & Platform WorkersProposer
Party
A Better Fjordheim
A Better Fjordheim is a patriotic party committed to a strong military, a confident national identity, a competitive free-market economy, and a responsible welfare system. We believe in protecting Fjordheim’s people, traditions, prosperity, and independence for generations to come.
Core pillars
Anne Halvorsen
Candidate for President of the Republic · Age 54
A fiery speaker with a radical vision, Anne Halvorsen has spent decades rallying communities with her electrifying oratory, blending analytical precision with a relentless drive for sweeping change.
Timeline
-
Draft6 January 2024
-
Vote Open6 January 2024
-
Vote Closed6 March 2024
-
Did Not Become Law6 March 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Nordting
PassedFor: 11 / 35 seats (31.4%)
Against: 7 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 17
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Better Fjordheim Proposer | 8 | Yes | No reason given |
| ASTER | 7 | No | This bill doesn't create new flexibility, it removes protections that already exist — sick pay, holiday, and pensions that gig workers won months ago, stripped back down to a minimum wage and accident insurance. Flexibility framed this way usually means precarity for the person doing the work and lower costs for the platform employing them, and ASTER has never voted to trade one for the other. We'd also note this specifically undoes a law Movement For Socialism achieved earlier this year — a genuine labor win, not an outdated rule in need of modernizing. Businesses can absolutely offer flexible arrangements without the state deciding, by default, that flexible work deserves fewer protections than any other kind. ASTER votes No. |
| Democratic Liberal Platform | 3 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Liberal Platform | 0 | Yes | Liberal Platform votes Yes. Flexibility in how people work is a matter of individual and economic freedom, not just business convenience. Not every gig worker wants — or benefits from — being forced into a traditional employment model; many choose platform work precisely for its flexibility. This bill doesn't strip protections outright: minimum pay and accident insurance remain guaranteed floors. What it removes is a one-size-fits-all classification that limited both workers' and entrepreneurs' freedom to structure work on their own terms. A free market rests on voluntary arrangements between consenting parties, provided basic safety nets hold — and they do here. Liberal Platform trusts individuals to negotiate work that suits their own lives, rather than having Fjordheim's government mandate a single model for everyone. |
| Libertarian Alliance | 0 | Yes | Workers’ rights matter, but lasting improvements are best achieved through a competitive labour market rather than excessive government intervention. If we want unemployment to fall, we need to make it easier and less costly for businesses to hire. Individuals should be free to decide which jobs, wages, and working conditions they are willing to accept. Government should protect basic legal rights and enforce contracts, but it should not dictate every term of the relationship between workers and employers. |
| Movement For Socialism | 0 | No | We reject this proposal |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Liberal Platform votes Yes. Flexibility in how people work is a matter of individual and economic freedom, not just business convenience. Not every gig worker wants — or benefits from — being forced into a traditional employment model; many choose platform work precisely for its flexibility. This bill doesn't strip protections outright: minimum pay and accident insurance remain guaranteed floors. What it removes is a one-size-fits-all classification that limited both workers' and entrepreneurs' freedom to structure work on their own terms. A free market rests on voluntary arrangements between consenting parties, provided basic safety nets hold — and they do here. Liberal Platform trusts individuals to negotiate work that suits their own lives, rather than having Fjordheim's government mandate a single model for everyone.”
“We reject this proposal”
“This bill doesn't create new flexibility, it removes protections that already exist — sick pay, holiday, and pensions that gig workers won months ago, stripped back down to a minimum wage and accident insurance. Flexibility framed this way usually means precarity for the person doing the work and lower costs for the platform employing them, and ASTER has never voted to trade one for the other. We'd also note this specifically undoes a law Movement For Socialism achieved earlier this year — a genuine labor win, not an outdated rule in need of modernizing. Businesses can absolutely offer flexible arrangements without the state deciding, by default, that flexible work deserves fewer protections than any other kind. ASTER votes No.”
“We support this proposal”