“Although still too much welfare in our eyes, a change is needed if we want our unemployment to stop stagnating. Libertarian Alliance stands firmly in favor of this proposal”
Fjordheim Welfare Responsibility and Opportunity of 2024
Rationale
A strong safety net should support those in need while encouraging those who are able to work toward employment and independence. This reform introduces reasonable expectations without removing essential support.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welfare Conditionality |
Unconditional benefits
|
Light conditions, few sanctions
|
1
Welfare ConditionalityProposer
Party
A Better Fjordheim
A Better Fjordheim is a patriotic party committed to a strong military, a confident national identity, a competitive free-market economy, and a responsible welfare system. We believe in protecting Fjordheim’s people, traditions, prosperity, and independence for generations to come.
Core pillars
Anne Halvorsen
Candidate for President of the Republic · Age 54
A fiery speaker with a radical vision, Anne Halvorsen has spent decades rallying communities with her electrifying oratory, blending analytical precision with a relentless drive for sweeping change.
Timeline
-
Draft14 May 2024
-
Vote Open30 May 2024
-
Vote Closed29 July 2024
-
Did Not Become Law29 July 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Nordting
FailedFor: 13 / 35 seats (37.1%)
Against: 20 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 2
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Better Fjordheim Proposer | 6 | Yes | No reason given |
| ASTER | 20 | No | ASTER votes no. Welfare exists because dignity should never be conditional — not on job-seeking, not on proving worthiness, not on anything. Introducing sanctions, however light, changes what the safety net fundamentally is: a right becomes a privilege that can be withdrawn. Most people receiving unconditional support already want independence; the ones who don't are usually the ones most in need of unconditional care, not additional pressure. Real incentives to work come from opportunity, education, and a functioning economy — not from the threat of losing support. ASTER will not trade a universal guarantee for a "light" version of conditionality. We remain open to reforms that expand opportunity without making care conditional on it. |
| Democratic Liberal Platform | 5 | Yes | This is common sense. |
| Libertarian Alliance | 2 | Yes | Although still too much welfare in our eyes, a change is needed if we want our unemployment to stop stagnating. Libertarian Alliance stands firmly in favor of this proposal |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“ASTER votes no. Welfare exists because dignity should never be conditional — not on job-seeking, not on proving worthiness, not on anything. Introducing sanctions, however light, changes what the safety net fundamentally is: a right becomes a privilege that can be withdrawn. Most people receiving unconditional support already want independence; the ones who don't are usually the ones most in need of unconditional care, not additional pressure. Real incentives to work come from opportunity, education, and a functioning economy — not from the threat of losing support. ASTER will not trade a universal guarantee for a "light" version of conditionality. We remain open to reforms that expand opportunity without making care conditional on it.”
“This is common sense.”