Fjordheim chooses restraint without ever choosing weakness: no first use of nuclear arms, no autonomous killing machines, no weapons sold abroad, full equality for women who serve, and lasting care for every veteran who already did.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuclear Weapons |
Maintain a minimal deterrent
|
Retain weapons, pledge no first use
|
|
| 2 | Autonomous Weapons Systems |
Permitted with mandatory human control
|
Ban autonomous weapons outright
|
|
| 3 | Arms Exports |
Licensed exports with end-use checks
|
Ban arms exports
|
|
| 4 | Women in the Armed Forces |
This Is An Order — a mandatory quota for the proportion of women in the armed forces
|
Equal Participation — women serve alongside men on equal terms
|
Party
ASTER believes no person's dignity should be bargained away. In Fjordheim, we choose dialogue over division, solidarity over isolation, and the stubborn hope that different people can share one future.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 56
A former labor union leader turned grassroots organizer, Susanne Nygård rose to prominence leading a successful campaign for equal pay in her coastal hometown, earning a reputation as both a pragmatic dealmaker and a fiery orator whose speeches could silence even the most skeptical critics.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 24 / 35 seats (68.6%)
Against: 8 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 3
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Better Fjordheim | 8 | No | We support accountability, equal service for women and proper care for veterans, but this bill places unnecessary limits on Fjordheim’s ability to defend itself. A no frist use pledge restricts our strategic options, an outright ban on autonomous weapons goes further than the current system of mandatory human control, and banning all arms exports removes a legitimate tool of defence cooperation and industry. Responsible safeguards are preferable to blanket prohibitions. Fjordheim should pursue peace through credible deterrence, modern military capability and strategic flexibility, not unilateral restrictions that potential adversaries may not share. We support the bill’s equality provisions, but cannot support weakening our broader defence posture. Once ABF will get to power, one of our first demands will be to revoke this bill from Fjordheims law book, as it hurting Fjordheims basic defense capabilities. |
| ASTER Proposer | 7 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Liberal Platform | 3 | Yes | Export controls are a bit too strict but we can live with the proposal |
| Movement For Socialism | 14 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Socialist Union Of Workers | 0 | Yes | This bill does not conflict with any of our policies and opinions and therefore we support it. |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Export controls are a bit too strict but we can live with the proposal”
“This bill does not conflict with any of our policies and opinions and therefore we support it.”
“We support accountability, equal service for women and proper care for veterans, but this bill places unnecessary limits on Fjordheim’s ability to defend itself. A no frist use pledge restricts our strategic options, an outright ban on autonomous weapons goes further than the current system of mandatory human control, and banning all arms exports removes a legitimate tool of defence cooperation and industry. Responsible safeguards are preferable to blanket prohibitions. Fjordheim should pursue peace through credible deterrence, modern military capability and strategic flexibility, not unilateral restrictions that potential adversaries may not share. We support the bill’s equality provisions, but cannot support weakening our broader defence posture. Once ABF will get to power, one of our first demands will be to revoke this bill from Fjordheims law book, as it hurting Fjordheims basic defense capabilities.”
“We support this proposal”