Legislative Bill · Fjordheim
Failed

Fjordheim Environmental Renewal Act of 2023

Proposed by ASTER · fronted by Silje Andersen
Failing
in the Nordting
Opened
6 Feb 2024
Voting closes
6 Apr 2024
Chambers
1 legislature
Articles
5 changes

Rationale

Fjordheim renews its bond with the land: strict animal welfare, real vehicle emission standards, a carbon price returned to every household, large-scale wildlife restoration, and the end of single-use plastic. A nation that protects its people protects what sustains them too.

Proposed Changes

1

Animal Welfare Standards
Previous law
Regulated farming standards and anti-cruelty laws
Strict welfare (ban factory farming; mandatory free-range; fur farming banned)

2

Vehicle Emissions Standards
Previous law
Emissions limits with gradual phase-in for new vehicles
Strict emissions standards with immediate enforcement and heavy fines

3

Land Conservation & Rewilding
Previous law
Balanced land use
Large-scale rewilding and new reserves

4

Single-Use Plastics
Previous law
Phased restrictions and charges
Ban single-use plastics outright

5

Carbon Pricing
Previous law
High carbon price with a border adjustment on imports
High carbon price returned to every citizen as a dividend

Timeline

  • Draft
    23 December 2023


  • Vote Open
    6 February 2024


  • Vote Closed
    6 April 2024


  • Did Not Become Law
    6 April 2024

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Nordting

Failed
7Yes 11No 17Not voted 35 seats

For: 7 / 35 seats (20.0%)

Against: 11 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 17

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 38.9%)
Party Seats Vote
A Better Fjordheim 8 No
ASTER Proposer 7 Yes
Democratic Liberal Platform 3 No
Libertarian Alliance 0 No
Movement For Socialism 0 Yes

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

“ABF supports protecting Fjordheim’s environment, but this bill replaces gradual reform with outright bans, heavy fines and major new burdens on farms, industry and consumers. Environmental progress should be practical and compatible with a competitive economy.”

No

“We are for gradual moving towards a greener economy and more nature conservation. This is too much, too quickly. This will stifle our economy, as we have already seen happen the last months.”

?
Game Wiki
Feature Roadmap
Bug report