For too long our nation has tried to overreach its power over their citizens. With this act we increase our citizens rights before the police, so they don't take advantage of their power, as well as maintaining the core of justice: innocent until proven guilty
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Police Search & Seizure |
Reasonable suspicion required; warrant needed for homes and devices
|
Judicial warrant needed for all searches and seizures except emergencies
|
|
| 2 | Bail & Pre-Trial Detention |
Risk assessment decides release
|
Presumption of release except for serious threats; cash bail abolished
|
Party
The party of bold growth and unshackled freedom where ambition meets opportunity and every dream is a spark for the next fire.
Core pillars
Prime Minister · Age 23
A working-class firebrand whose viral speeches on social media catapulted her from obscurity to national fame at just 23, Silje Sørensen channels the frustrations of ordinary citizens into a radical vision for individual freedom and economic opportunity.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 35 / 35 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Better Fjordheim | 11 | Yes | ABF supports strong protections for individual liberty and due process while preserving emergency powers and detention for genuine public-safety threats. |
| ASTER | 0 | Yes | ASTER votes yes. This isn't the deregulation we've opposed before, it's the opposite: less unchecked power over citizens, not less protection for them. Requiring a warrant for searches, barring emergencies, keeps the police accountable to a judge, not just to themselves. And ending cash bail fixes a system where wealth decided who stayed free before trial, not risk. Presumption of innocence should mean something more than a slogan. This bill makes it one. |
| Democratic Liberal Platform | 5 | Yes | We support this bill. |
| Libertarian Alliance Proposer | 19 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“ABF supports strong protections for individual liberty and due process while preserving emergency powers and detention for genuine public-safety threats.”
“ASTER votes yes. This isn't the deregulation we've opposed before, it's the opposite: less unchecked power over citizens, not less protection for them. Requiring a warrant for searches, barring emergencies, keeps the police accountable to a judge, not just to themselves. And ending cash bail fixes a system where wealth decided who stayed free before trial, not risk. Presumption of innocence should mean something more than a slogan. This bill makes it one.”
“We support this bill.”