Fjordheim’s defence industry should strengthen our national security and our closest partnerships, not arm governments we cannot trust. This Act limits arms exports to close allies while ensuring Fjordheim remains at the forefront of responsible military technology.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arms Exports |
Ban arms exports
|
Export only to close allies
|
|
| 2 | Autonomous Weapons Systems |
Ban autonomous weapons outright
|
Permitted with mandatory human control
|
Party
A Better Fjordheim is a patriotic party committed to a strong military, a confident national identity, a competitive free-market economy, and a responsible welfare system. We believe in protecting Fjordheim’s people, traditions, prosperity, and independence for generations to come.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 43
Once a high-flying investment banker, Birgitta Sandberg traded spreadsheets for stump speeches, using her razor-sharp wit and relentless ambition to mobilize support—while keeping an eye on the leadership.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 11 / 35 seats (31.4%)
Against: 7 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 17
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Better Fjordheim Proposer | 8 | Yes | No reason given |
| ASTER | 7 | No | This bill reverses, article by article, the two strongest commitments in ASTER's own Peace and Accountability Act. We banned arms exports outright; this brings back a "close allies" exception, a category that shifts with whichever government holds power and whichever war looks convenient to arm at the time. We banned autonomous weapons outright; this brings back "mandatory human control," the same soft safeguard the world has already watched erode in practice once the technology existed and the incentive to use it followed. A total ban doesn't ask anyone to trust that oversight holds — it removes the choice from the table entirely, for every government that comes after this one, not just this one. Fjordheim chose restraint deliberately, in writing. We're not walking it back because a "responsible" version sounds better than the real thing. ASTER votes No. |
| Democratic Liberal Platform | 3 | Yes | The second article goes too far, but the first we can live with |
| Libertarian Alliance | 0 | Yes | This is a step in the right direction, towards liberalizing trade and technology. For that reason the Libertarian Alliance agrees with this. |
| Movement For Socialism | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is a step in the right direction, towards liberalizing trade and technology. For that reason the Libertarian Alliance agrees with this.”
“The second article goes too far, but the first we can live with”
“We support this proposal”
“This bill reverses, article by article, the two strongest commitments in ASTER's own Peace and Accountability Act. We banned arms exports outright; this brings back a "close allies" exception, a category that shifts with whichever government holds power and whichever war looks convenient to arm at the time. We banned autonomous weapons outright; this brings back "mandatory human control," the same soft safeguard the world has already watched erode in practice once the technology existed and the incentive to use it followed. A total ban doesn't ask anyone to trust that oversight holds — it removes the choice from the table entirely, for every government that comes after this one, not just this one. Fjordheim chose restraint deliberately, in writing. We're not walking it back because a "responsible" version sounds better than the real thing. ASTER votes No.”