“Step in the right direction. We are still of the opinion that welfare spending is much too high and differs greatly from neighboring countries, and we do not like a spending spree. But priorities are chosen correctly.”
Fjordheim Growth and Competitiveness Budget
Proposed by A Better Fjordheim · Passed 24 Mar 2024
Rationale
This budget uses Fjordheim’s strong fiscal position to support business growth, improve infrastructure, and invest in education while keeping spending disciplined and maintaining a healthy surplus.
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
Annual Spending
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $2,143 | $12.0bn | |
| Retirement | $5,000 | $28.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $3,750 | $21.0bn | |
| Education | $1,964 $2,143 | $11.0bn $12.0bn | |
| Housing | $893 | $5.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $786 | $4.4bn | |
| Defence | $714 | $4.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $304 | $1.7bn | |
| Business Support | $179 $714 | $1.0bn $4.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $304 | $1.7bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $214 | $1.2bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $389 $510 | $2.2bn $2.9bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $311 $408 | $1.7bn $2.3bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $233 $306 | $1.3bn $1.7bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $156 $204 | $0.9bn $1.1bn | |
| Total | $97.1bn $103.0bn |
Vote tally
Nordting
Passed
11Yes
0No
10Not voted
21 seats
For: 11 / 21 filled seats (52.4%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 10
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Better Fjordheim Proposer | 8 | Yes | No reason given |
| Democratic Liberal Platform | 3 | Yes | Step in the right direction. We are still of the opinion that welfare spending is much too high and differs greatly from neighboring countries, and we do not like a spending spree. But priorities are chosen correctly. |
| Libertarian Alliance | 19 | Not voted |