Workplace Rights Rollback Proposal of 2024
Rationale
These changes modernize labour laws to balance worker protections with economic flexibility, reducing disruptions while maintaining fair employment standards.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trade Union Rights |
Full collective bargaining and strike rights
|
Unions permitted but strikes severely limited (cooling-off periods; binding arbitration)
|
|
| 2 | Worker Representation on Company Boards |
No requirement; boards are the shareholders' business
|
Employee representatives barred from boards and works councils
|
|
| 3 | Workplace Safety |
Statutory safety standards enforced by a labour inspectorate
|
Minimal duties; enforced only after a complaint
|
|
| 4 | Zero-Hour & On-Call Contracts |
Permitted with minimum notice and pay for cancelled shifts
|
Permitted, but exclusivity clauses banned
|
|
| 5 | Right to Protest |
Unrestricted right to assemble
|
Right to protest with prior notice
|
1
Trade Union Rights2
Worker Representation on Company Boards3
Workplace Safety4
Zero-Hour & On-Call Contracts5
Right to ProtestProposer
Party
New Morning Movement
A movement for economic freedom, smaller government, and individual initiative. We champion free markets, lower taxes, and personal responsibility. Inspired by the conviction that prosperity comes from people, not the state. No compromise, no retreat, no turning back!
Core pillars
Malcolm Vaughan
Activist · Age 25
From viral debates to sold-out rallies, Malcolm Vaughan leverages his celebrity status and sharp intellect to mobilize young voters, embodying both the movement's modern appeal and its unwavering principles.
Timeline
-
Draft30 September 2024
-
Vote Open30 September 2024
-
Vote Closed29 November 2024
-
Did Not Become Law29 November 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
FailedFor: 29 / 100 seats (29.0%)
Against: 69 · Abstained: 2 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 19 | No | Censor workers bill. |
| Distributists | 10 | No | There is no reason to give the people less power |
| Freedom Alliance | 11 | No | Stupid stepback for our rights |
| Frente De Izquierda Y Trabajadores | 2 | Abstain | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement Proposer | 29 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 29 | No | We in the PDU are of the view that limiting the rights of unions is the same as limiting the rights of workers to their freedom of assembly |
The People’s Assembly
FailedFor: 58 / 200 seats (29.0%)
Against: 138 · Abstained: 4 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 38 | No | Censor workers bill. |
| Distributists | 20 | No | There is no reason to give the people less power |
| Freedom Alliance | 22 | No | Stupid stepback for our rights |
| Frente De Izquierda Y Trabajadores | 4 | Abstain | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement Proposer | 58 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 58 | No | We in the PDU are of the view that limiting the rights of unions is the same as limiting the rights of workers to their freedom of assembly |
First Citizen
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hill Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“There is no reason to give the people less power”
“Stupid stepback for our rights”
“We in the PDU are of the view that limiting the rights of unions is the same as limiting the rights of workers to their freedom of assembly”
“Censor workers bill.”