“We will not support this bill, for the sake of Drumagh's economic recovery. Of course, we woud like to support measures 2, 3 and 4, some of which we have already attempted to pass ourselves. But articles 1 and 5 would put a financial strain on the country that is not very welcomed given Drumagh's indebtment.”
Workers' Rights And Social Protections Act of 2021
Rationale
These reforms modernize labour, family, and digital rights to prioritize worker safety, parental equity, privacy, and mental health equity for public wellbeing.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Child Labour Law |
Light work permitted from age 14; full employment from 16
|
Employment permitted from age 16 with restrictions; no work under 16
|
|
| 2 | Right to Strike |
Protected with a lawful ballot
|
Unrestricted right to strike, incl. solidarity action
|
|
| 3 | Parental Leave Policy |
Mandatory one-year leave for both parents; employers may not contact them
|
Shared, non-transferable parental leave (use-it-or-lose-it for each parent)
|
|
| 4 | Data Privacy & Digital Rights |
Strict data rights (right to deletion; algorithmic transparency; heavy fines for violations)
|
Ban all personal data collection by private companies
|
|
| 5 | Mental Health Provision |
Expanded but not guaranteed access
|
Legal right to timely mental-health care
|
1
Child Labour Law2
Right to Strike3
Parental Leave Policy4
Data Privacy & Digital Rights5
Mental Health ProvisionProposer
Party
The United Workers Front
The UWF was founded on the 14th October 2021 by Disgruntled workers, who where tired of the governement and their inaction, especially against the terrible debt, welfare cuts, and the ignorance of the workers, The UWF is, hoping for a Worker's Democracy to Shine, And maximize liberal freedom
Core pillars
Alexander Baker
Activist · Age 58
A former car salesman turned firebrand orator, his decades of selling dreams to the working class now fuel his rallies, where his magnetic charm and sharp wit turn skepticism into solidarity.
Timeline
-
Draft15 October 2021
-
Vote Open15 October 2021
-
Vote Closed14 December 2021
-
Did Not Become Law14 December 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
PassedFor: 54 / 100 seats (54.0%)
Against: 38 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 8
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 17 | No | Unrestricted rights to strike will lead to chaos. We support the workers right to strike as long as it is democratically decided by the collective of workers and not troublemakers seeking to cause chaos and corrupt the strong workers of Drumagh. |
| Radical Republican Union | 21 | No | We will not support this bill, for the sake of Drumagh's economic recovery. Of course, we woud like to support measures 2, 3 and 4, some of which we have already attempted to pass ourselves. But articles 1 and 5 would put a financial strain on the country that is not very welcomed given Drumagh's indebtment. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 42 | Yes | It is a deceptive social-democratic compromise that seeks to pacify class struggle instead of overthrowing the bourgeois system. On one hand, it dangles advances in digital rights or mental health to buy social peace; on the other hand, it institutionalizes and regulates the right to strike instead of recognizing the absolute sovereignty of workers. As revolutionaries, we cannot endorse these superficial reforms that keep the capitalist state apparatus intact and try to lull proletarian consciousness with legislative crumbs. True emancipation will never come from the bourgeois Parliament, but from the destruction of the existing order through revolutionary struggle. |
| The United Workers Front Proposer | 12 | Yes | No reason given |
The People’s Assembly
PassedFor: 108 / 200 seats (54.0%)
Against: 76 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 34 | No | Unrestricted rights to strike will lead to chaos. We support the workers right to strike as long as it is democratically decided by the collective of workers and not troublemakers seeking to cause chaos and corrupt the strong workers of Drumagh. |
| Radical Republican Union | 42 | No | We will not support this bill, for the sake of Drumagh's economic recovery. Of course, we woud like to support measures 2, 3 and 4, some of which we have already attempted to pass ourselves. But articles 1 and 5 would put a financial strain on the country that is not very welcomed given Drumagh's indebtment. |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 84 | Yes | It is a deceptive social-democratic compromise that seeks to pacify class struggle instead of overthrowing the bourgeois system. On one hand, it dangles advances in digital rights or mental health to buy social peace; on the other hand, it institutionalizes and regulates the right to strike instead of recognizing the absolute sovereignty of workers. As revolutionaries, we cannot endorse these superficial reforms that keep the capitalist state apparatus intact and try to lull proletarian consciousness with legislative crumbs. True emancipation will never come from the bourgeois Parliament, but from the destruction of the existing order through revolutionary struggle. |
| The United Workers Front Proposer | 24 | Yes | No reason given |
First Citizen
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Unrestricted rights to strike will lead to chaos. We support the workers right to strike as long as it is democratically decided by the collective of workers and not troublemakers seeking to cause chaos and corrupt the strong workers of Drumagh.”
“It is a deceptive social-democratic compromise that seeks to pacify class struggle instead of overthrowing the bourgeois system. On one hand, it dangles advances in digital rights or mental health to buy social peace; on the other hand, it institutionalizes and regulates the right to strike instead of recognizing the absolute sovereignty of workers. As revolutionaries, we cannot endorse these superficial reforms that keep the capitalist state apparatus intact and try to lull proletarian consciousness with legislative crumbs. True emancipation will never come from the bourgeois Parliament, but from the destruction of the existing order through revolutionary struggle.”
“It is a deceptive social-democratic compromise that seeks to pacify class struggle instead of overthrowing the bourgeois system. On one hand, it dangles advances in digital rights or mental health to buy social peace; on the other hand, it institutionalizes and regulates the right to strike instead of recognizing the absolute sovereignty of workers. As revolutionaries, we cannot endorse these superficial reforms that keep the capitalist state apparatus intact and try to lull proletarian consciousness with legislative crumbs. True emancipation will never come from the bourgeois Parliament, but from the destruction of the existing order through revolutionary struggle.”