These changes strengthen worker rights, protect consumers, and curb exploitative financial practices to build fairer, safer societies.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Strong prudential oversight
|
Capital controls, separated retail/investment banking
|
|
| 2 | Child Labour Law |
Light work permitted from age 14; full employment from 16
|
No employment of any kind until age 18
|
|
| 3 | Consumer Protection |
Statutory refund/replace for faulty goods within a set period; basic safety standards
|
Lifetime right to repair, mandatory long warranties, automatic recalls, class actions, a regulator that fines and bans products
|
|
| 4 | Gig Economy & Platform Workers |
Gig workers classified as employees with full rights (sick pay, holiday, pensions)
|
Gig platforms banned; all work must be traditional employment contracts
|
|
| 5 | Paid Annual Leave |
~4 weeks statutory paid leave
|
6+ weeks statutory paid leave
|
Party
The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front champions the peasantry over the urban elite, waging protracted people's war against imperialism and bureaucratic corruption. We reject Soviet-style centralism, trusting instead in mass mobilization, national self-reliance, and armed revolutionary struggle.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 47
A former investigative journalist turned firebrand politician, Edmund Harrington leveraged his media savvy to expose corruption before becoming the party’s most commanding orator, his loyalty to the leadership unshaken by years of public battles.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 54 / 100 seats (54.0%)
Against: 17 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 29
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 17 | No | We oppose the government policies. |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | No | No, we like freedom and liberty |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 42 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 12 | Yes | Although we agree with almost all of the stances, we cant accept articlce 4, but we agree on almost every stance |
For: 108 / 200 seats (54.0%)
Against: 34 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 58
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 34 | No | We oppose the government policies. |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | No | No, we like freedom and liberty |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 84 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 24 | Yes | Although we agree with almost all of the stances, we cant accept articlce 4, but we agree on almost every stance |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“No, we like freedom and liberty”
“We oppose the government policies.”
“Although we agree with almost all of the stances, we cant accept articlce 4, but we agree on almost every stance”
“Although we agree with almost all of the stances, we cant accept articlce 4”