“Although we would prefer this to go further, as it would reduce the loss of manpower or productivity caused by dental and optical issues, we see this as a step towards the right direction.”
Subsidized Dental & Optical Act of 2024
Rationale
Dental and optical care are essential yet financially out of reach for low-income citizens; this change ensures equitable access to prevent costly long-term health issues.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What Public Healthcare Covers |
Core medical care; dental and optical private
|
Dental and optical subsidised for low-income citizens
|
1
What Public Healthcare CoversProposer
Party
Progressive Democratic Union
the Progressive Democrats are a centrist - center right liberal party based on the ideas of a free and fair market , social spending with precaution and social liberalism.
Core pillars
Benjamin Wilson
Minister for Finance · Age 31
A 23-year-old orator and policy wonk whose relentless energy in student debates and speech competitions earned him a reputation as a rising star, now bringing his sharp pragmatism and unshakable loyalty to the movement.
Timeline
-
Draft6 April 2024
-
Vote Open6 April 2024
-
Vote Closed5 June 2024
-
Became Law5 June 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
PassedFor: 54 / 100 seats (54.0%)
Against: 16 · Abstained: 10 · Not voted: 20
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 17 | Yes | Although we would prefer this to go further, as it would reduce the loss of manpower or productivity caused by dental and optical issues, we see this as a step towards the right direction. |
| Distributists | 10 | Abstain | We are not opposed nor in favor of it |
| Drumagh Civic Alliance | 17 | Yes | Moving towards right path. Furthermore we want them to be free too |
| Freedom Alliance | 0 | Yes | Great law for our people |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | No | We need more privatisation |
| Monarchist League | 0 | No | Absolutely not. Do you know how expensive that would be for a country in this much debt? |
| New Morning Movement | 16 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union Proposer | 20 | Yes | No reason given |
The People’s Assembly
PassedFor: 108 / 200 seats (54.0%)
Against: 31 · Abstained: 20 · Not voted: 41
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 34 | Yes | Although we would prefer this to go further, as it would reduce the loss of manpower or productivity caused by dental and optical issues, we see this as a step towards the right direction. |
| Distributists | 20 | Abstain | We are not opposed nor in favor of it |
| Drumagh Civic Alliance | 34 | Yes | Moving towards right path. Furthermore we want them to be free too |
| Freedom Alliance | 0 | Yes | Great law for our people |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | No | We need more privatisation |
| Monarchist League | 0 | No | Absolutely not. Do you know how expensive that would be for a country in this much debt? |
| New Morning Movement | 31 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union Proposer | 40 | Yes | No reason given |
First Citizen
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Democratic Union Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Great law for our people”
“We can't support this bill”
“Absolutely not. Do you know how expensive that would be for a country in this much debt?”
“We are not opposed nor in favor of it”
“We need more privatisation”
“Moving towards right path. Furthermore we want them to be free too”