“We can‘t also support the proposal because of the articles 1, 3 and 5 these are radical ideas”
Strict Law And Order Expansion of 2023
Rationale
These changes prioritize public health, economic fairness, national unity, public safety, and justice by implementing stricter measures to protect citizens and uphold societal values.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tobacco & Vaping Regulation |
Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)
|
Total ban on tobacco and vaping products; possession criminalized
|
|
| 2 | National Anthem in Schools |
Weekly assembly anthem (participation optional)
|
Mandatory daily anthem (all students present; opt-out only for documented reasons)
|
|
| 3 | Police Powers |
Focus on highest impact crimes
|
Zero tolerance
|
|
| 4 | Capital Punishment |
No death penalty
|
Death penalty for murder, treason, and drug trafficking
|
|
| 5 | Competition & Monopolies |
Active competition enforcement
|
Active competition enforcement
|
1
Tobacco & Vaping Regulation2
National Anthem in Schools3
Police Powers4
Capital Punishment5
Competition & MonopoliesProposer
Party
Centralist Unity
Centralist Unity forges a nation of order and strength! We will restore the authority of the central government and bring back the glory and prosperity that has been robbed from our motherland.
Core pillars
Sarah Hall
Minister of Health & Human Services · Age 25
At 21, Sarah Hall is already a rising star in political circles, blending sharp academic insight with fiery idealism and an uncompromising refusal to bend to political expediency.
Timeline
-
Draft21 March 2023
-
Vote Open21 March 2023
-
Vote Closed20 May 2023
-
Did Not Become Law20 May 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
FailedFor: 17 / 100 seats (17.0%)
Against: 70 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 13
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 28 | No | Article 1 and 3 go too far |
| New Morning Movement | 12 | No | We can’t support this proposal due to articles 2, 3 and 5 |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 14 | No | We believe this act to be extreme, especially in its proposed curbing of civil liberties by mandating along with further zero tolerance policy |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 1 | No | We can‘t also support the proposal because of the articles 1, 3 and 5 these are radical ideas |
| The United Workers Front | 15 | No | death penalty is extreme, we cant accept |
The People’s Assembly
FailedFor: 33 / 200 seats (16.5%)
Against: 141 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 26
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 33 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 57 | No | Article 1 and 3 go too far |
| New Morning Movement | 24 | No | We can’t support this proposal due to articles 2, 3 and 5 |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 28 | No | We believe this act to be extreme, especially in its proposed curbing of civil liberties by mandating along with further zero tolerance policy |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 3 | No | We can‘t also support the proposal because of the articles 1, 3 and 5 these are radical ideas |
| The United Workers Front | 29 | No | death penalty is extreme, we cant accept |
First Citizen
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We can’t support this proposal due to articles 2, 3 and 5”
“Article 1 and 3 go too far”
“death penalty is extreme, we cant accept”
“We believe this act to be extreme, especially in its proposed curbing of civil liberties by mandating along with further zero tolerance policy”