To reduce public health harms and crime, strict substance control is needed despite individual freedoms.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alcohol Regulation |
Liberal policy (age 18; moderate tax; late opening permitted; public zones allowed)
|
Strict regulation (age 21; high excise; retail 10:00–20:00; public drinking banned)
|
|
| 2 | Marijuana Policy |
Legalization (age 21; licensed retail; THC tax; roadside impairment tests)
|
Full prohibition (possession criminalized; prison possible for repeat offences)
|
|
| 3 | Psychedelics Policy |
Legal, licensed, regulated retail
|
Full prohibition; possession criminalised, prison for repeat offences
|
Party
The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front champions the peasantry over the urban elite, waging protracted people's war against imperialism and bureaucratic corruption. We reject Soviet-style centralism, trusting instead in mass mobilization, national self-reliance, and armed revolutionary struggle.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 47
A former investigative journalist turned firebrand politician, Edmund Harrington leveraged his media savvy to expose corruption before becoming the party’s most commanding orator, his loyalty to the leadership unshaken by years of public battles.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 39 / 100 seats (39.0%)
Against: 28 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 33
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Libertarian Congress | 28 | No | What did you expect? |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 23 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 16 | Yes | Alchohol and drugs destroy our people and the working class, we must protect them, thats why we vote yes |
For: 77 / 200 seats (38.5%)
Against: 56 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 67
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Libertarian Congress | 56 | No | What did you expect? |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 45 | Yes | No reason given |
| The United Workers Front | 32 | Yes | Alchohol and drugs destroy our people and the working class, we must protect them, thats why we vote yes |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Alchohol and drugs destroy our people and the working class, we must protect them, thats why we vote yes”
“What did you expect?”