Strengthen accountability, transparency, and equity by closing loopholes in corruption, lobbying, monopolies, and language rights for fairer governance and opportunity for all.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anti-Corruption Commission |
Independent commission with investigative powers
|
Independent commission with its own prosecutors and asset-seizure powers
|
|
| 2 | Lobbying & Political Donations |
Unrestricted donations and lobbying
|
Strict caps and a public lobbying register
|
|
| 3 | Competition & Monopolies |
Active competition enforcement
|
Proactively break up dominant firms
|
|
| 4 | Official Language Policy |
Ban other languages in schools and government services
|
Multilingual rights guaranteed (core services available in multiple languages)
|
Party
The power of distribution where everyone owns
Core pillars
Candidate for First Citizen · Age 43
A former quantitative analyst who left the private sector to fight for working families, Philip Robinson’s data-driven pragmatism and unshakable loyalty to leadership have made him a trusted strategist in the party’s ranks.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 9 / 100 seats (9.0%)
Against: 35 · Abstained: 48 · Not voted: 8
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 19 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Distributists Proposer | 9 | Yes | No reason given |
| Freedom Alliance | 11 | No | We don’t agree on the last article because it goes really too far for what it is. |
| New Morning Movement | 24 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 29 | Abstain | This bill goes too far in many aspects, especially on competition and monopolies. We are an ordoliberal party that believes in regulation, but breaking up firms while they haven't broken any laws seems like a violation of the rule of law to us |
For: 18 / 200 seats (9.0%)
Against: 69 · Abstained: 96 · Not voted: 17
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 38 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Distributists Proposer | 18 | Yes | No reason given |
| Freedom Alliance | 21 | No | We don’t agree on the last article because it goes really too far for what it is. |
| New Morning Movement | 48 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 58 | Abstain | This bill goes too far in many aspects, especially on competition and monopolies. We are an ordoliberal party that believes in regulation, but breaking up firms while they haven't broken any laws seems like a violation of the rule of law to us |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hill | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We don’t agree on the last article because it goes really too far for what it is.”
“We can't support this bill”
“This bill goes too far in many aspects, especially on competition and monopolies. We are an ordoliberal party that believes in regulation, but breaking up firms while they haven't broken any laws seems like a violation of the rule of law to us”