As university education is free and strictly state-run, we believe it would be sensible to establish institutions of republican excellence, accessible solely through competitive entrance examinations, and entirely free of charge, in order to promote young talent through meritocracy.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | School Selection |
Comprehensive, mixed-ability classes
|
Selective grammar schools by exam
|
Party
A party funded by strongly anti-clerical republicans advocating for a centralised governance and economic interventionism. The Party advocates for a mixed welfare economy focused on national development through voluntarist policies. Their major cause is absolute and radical secularisation.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 34
A political science prodigy who quietly shaped policy for years, Penelope Sinclair combines razor-sharp intellect with a willingness to exploit weaknesses in the opposition to push her vision forward.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 80 / 100 seats (80.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 20
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 17 | Yes | We are fully supportive of a society based on merit, as that will incentive innovation, skill and a fusion of hard and smart labor. |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | Yes | Sure why not we like this |
| Radical Republican Union Proposer | 21 | Yes | No reason given |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 42 | Yes | True equality is not pretending all talent is identical, it is ensuring every child of the people, regardless of birth or wealth, has the chance to rise through ability alone. Under capitalism, "elite education" means private schools bought by rich families. This proposal is different: entry decided by examination, not inheritance, and entirely free of charge. The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front does not fear excellence, we fear excellence reserved for the bourgeoisie. By opening these institutions to all children on equal footing, we turn meritocracy into a weapon against class privilege, not a tool of it. The brightest children of workers and peasants deserve the same opportunities as the children of the wealthy. We remain vigilant, these schools must never become breeding grounds for a new detached elite. But as proposed, free, competitive, open to all, this reform serves the people's talent, not private wealth. We vote YES, while pledging to monitor its implementation closely. |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
For: 160 / 200 seats (80.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 40
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 34 | Yes | We are fully supportive of a society based on merit, as that will incentive innovation, skill and a fusion of hard and smart labor. |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | Yes | Sure why not we like this |
| Radical Republican Union Proposer | 42 | Yes | No reason given |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 84 | Yes | True equality is not pretending all talent is identical, it is ensuring every child of the people, regardless of birth or wealth, has the chance to rise through ability alone. Under capitalism, "elite education" means private schools bought by rich families. This proposal is different: entry decided by examination, not inheritance, and entirely free of charge. The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front does not fear excellence, we fear excellence reserved for the bourgeoisie. By opening these institutions to all children on equal footing, we turn meritocracy into a weapon against class privilege, not a tool of it. The brightest children of workers and peasants deserve the same opportunities as the children of the wealthy. We remain vigilant, these schools must never become breeding grounds for a new detached elite. But as proposed, free, competitive, open to all, this reform serves the people's talent, not private wealth. We vote YES, while pledging to monitor its implementation closely. |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Sure why not we like this”
“We are fully supportive of a society based on merit, as that will incentive innovation, skill and a fusion of hard and smart labor.”
“True equality is not pretending all talent is identical, it is ensuring every child of the people, regardless of birth or wealth, has the chance to rise through ability alone. Under capitalism, "elite education" means private schools bought by rich families. This proposal is different: entry decided by examination, not inheritance, and entirely free of charge. The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front does not fear excellence, we fear excellence reserved for the bourgeoisie. By opening these institutions to all children on equal footing, we turn meritocracy into a weapon against class privilege, not a tool of it. The brightest children of workers and peasants deserve the same opportunities as the children of the wealthy. We remain vigilant, these schools must never become breeding grounds for a new detached elite. But as proposed, free, competitive, open to all, this reform serves the people's talent, not private wealth. We vote YES, while pledging to monitor its implementation closely.”