These reforms reduce costs and bureaucracy by shifting to private models, improving efficiency while maintaining essential protections for public benefit.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Healthcare System Model |
Single public system, free at point of use
|
Mainly private insurance
|
|
| 2 | Social Care for the Elderly |
Free universal social care
|
Means-tested, self-funded above threshold
|
|
| 3 | Consumer Protection |
Lifetime right to repair, mandatory long warranties, automatic recalls, class actions, a regulator that fines and bans products
|
Statutory refund/replace for faulty goods within a set period; basic safety standards
|
Party
We forge freedom where others fear risk. The market breathes open borders and unshackled hands.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 57
A decorated military officer turned politician, his charismatic speeches and media savvy helped rally the public behind the party’s ideals during a period of national uncertainty.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 39 / 100 seats (39.0%)
Against: 49 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 12
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 23 | No | So called "efficiency" that this bill seeks will quickly be reverted when workers are unable to pay for healthcare, and thus spend more time sick, and when they are forced to assist their elderly with much more than just a part of their taxes. Ending public healthcare and care for the elderly will not bring efficiency, gains or any other benefits to Drumagh or its people, but will certainly bring many new profits for a pharmaceutical-financist clique. And who is against consumer protections? The better they are for consumers the more the designers are forced to make higher quality products, thus improving Drumagh's productive quality. |
| Libertarian Congress Proposer | 21 | Yes | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement | 18 | Yes | We really love that! |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 18 | No | The PDU does not support weakening consumer protections, or cutting social care to an effective means tested program, or in effectiveness abolishing public insurance |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 8 | No | We can’t agree with this bill |
For: 77 / 200 seats (38.5%)
Against: 98 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 25
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 46 | No | So called "efficiency" that this bill seeks will quickly be reverted when workers are unable to pay for healthcare, and thus spend more time sick, and when they are forced to assist their elderly with much more than just a part of their taxes. Ending public healthcare and care for the elderly will not bring efficiency, gains or any other benefits to Drumagh or its people, but will certainly bring many new profits for a pharmaceutical-financist clique. And who is against consumer protections? The better they are for consumers the more the designers are forced to make higher quality products, thus improving Drumagh's productive quality. |
| Libertarian Congress Proposer | 41 | Yes | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement | 36 | Yes | We really love that! |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 35 | No | The PDU does not support weakening consumer protections, or cutting social care to an effective means tested program, or in effectiveness abolishing public insurance |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 17 | No | We can’t agree with this bill |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Libertarian Congress Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We can’t agree with this bill”
“So called "efficiency" that this bill seeks will quickly be reverted when workers are unable to pay for healthcare, and thus spend more time sick, and when they are forced to assist their elderly with much more than just a part of their taxes. Ending public healthcare and care for the elderly will not bring efficiency, gains or any other benefits to Drumagh or its people, but will certainly bring many new profits for a pharmaceutical-financist clique. And who is against consumer protections? The better they are for consumers the more the designers are forced to make higher quality products, thus improving Drumagh's productive quality.”
“The PDU does not support weakening consumer protections, or cutting social care to an effective means tested program, or in effectiveness abolishing public insurance”
“We really love that!”