New Morning Movement
Voted Feb. 26, 2023
Abstain
Public Ownership And Education Reform of 2023
Passing
in all 2 chambers
Opened
12 Jan 2023
Voting closes
13 Mar 2023
Chambers
2 legislatures
Articles
2 changes
Rationale
These changes ensure efficient public services, reduce inequality, and promote fairness by modernising outdated policies to better serve community needs.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Nationalise all key utilities and transport
|
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
|
| 2 | School Selection |
Selective grammar schools by exam
|
Comprehensive, no selection
|
1
Public Ownership of Key IndustriesPrevious law
Nationalise all key utilities and transport
Public ownership of natural monopolies
2
School SelectionPrevious law
Selective grammar schools by exam
Comprehensive, no selection
Proposer
Party
The United Workers Front
The UWF was founded on the 14th October 2021 by Disgruntled workers, who where tired of the governement and their inaction, especially against the terrible debt, welfare cuts, and the ignorance of the workers, The UWF is, hoping for a Worker's Democracy to Shine, And maximize liberal freedom
Core pillars
🚩
🗽
🛡️
🔨
AB
Alexander Baker
Activist · Age 58
262,000 social followers
A former car salesman turned firebrand orator, his decades of selling dreams to the working class now fuel his rallies, where his magnetic charm and sharp wit turn skepticism into solidarity.
🎤 Fantastic Speaker
📺 Media Savvy
🌍 Outsider
🏙️ Street Smart
Timeline
-
Draft12 January 2023
-
Vote Open12 January 2023
-
Vote Closed13 March 2023
-
Became Law13 March 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
Passed
13Yes
0No
77Abstained
10Not voted
100 seats
For: 13 / 100 seats (13.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 77 · Not voted: 10
50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 19 | Abstain | We see no reason to be involved in a debate wich puts two massively different topics together. This, de facto, is because we support article 1 while opposing article 2. |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement | 29 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 29 | Abstain | We support article 1 as a better alternative and oppose article 2 |
| The United Workers Front Proposer | 13 | Yes | No reason given |
The People’s Assembly
Passed
26Yes
0No
154Abstained
20Not voted
200 seats
For: 26 / 200 seats (13.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 154 · Not voted: 20
50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 38 | Abstain | We see no reason to be involved in a debate wich puts two massively different topics together. This, de facto, is because we support article 1 while opposing article 2. |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement | 58 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 58 | Abstain | We support article 1 as a better alternative and oppose article 2 |
| The United Workers Front Proposer | 26 | Yes | No reason given |
First Citizen
Passed
0Yes
0No
1Not voted
1 seat
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
Centralist Unity
Voted Feb. 21, 2023
Abstain
“We see no reason to be involved in a debate wich puts two massively different topics together. This, de facto, is because we support article 1 while opposing article 2.”
Progressive Democratic Union
Voted Jan. 17, 2023
Abstain
“We support article 1 as a better alternative and oppose article 2”
Libertarian Congress
Voted Jan. 17, 2023
Abstain