Firearms And Civil Liberties Modernization Act of 2021 - Drumagh

Rationale

These changes modernize public safety and civil liberties by reducing unnecessary restrictions while tightening harmful practices, balancing security with individual freedoms.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous	Proposed
1	Firearms Control	Total civilian firearms ban	Strict licensing, limited categories
2	National Identity Cards	Mandatory ID card	Voluntary ID card
3	Right to Protest	Right to protest with prior notice	Unrestricted right to assemble
4	Arms Exports	Sell arms with minimal restriction	Ban arms exports
5	Autonomous Weapons Systems	Permitted with mandatory human control	Ban autonomous weapons outright

1

Firearms Control

Previous law

Total civilian firearms ban

Strict licensing, limited categories

2

National Identity Cards

Previous law

Mandatory ID card

Voluntary ID card

3

Right to Protest

Previous law

Right to protest with prior notice

Unrestricted right to assemble

4

Arms Exports

Previous law

Sell arms with minimal restriction

Ban arms exports

5

Autonomous Weapons Systems

Previous law

Permitted with mandatory human control

Ban autonomous weapons outright

Proposer

Party

peopleswing

The Peopleswing party plants freedom in fertile ground and builds bridges to tomorrow. We turn wealth into roads and rights into harvests for every hand that dares.

Core pillars

Joseph Smith

Activist · Age 59

126,957 social followers

Once a high-flying financier, Joseph Smith traded Wall Street prestige for mass appeal, leveraging his celebrity status and vast connections to become the party’s magnetic public face.

⭐ Celebrity ✨ Charismatic 🏦 Former Banker 🔗 Well Connected

Timeline

Draft

4 February 2021
Vote Open

4 May 2021
Vote Closed

3 July 2021
Did Not Become Law

3 July 2021

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

First Council of Ministers

Failed

17Yes 67No 16Not voted 100 seats

For: 17 / 100 seats (17.0%)

Against: 67 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 20.2%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Centralist Unity	25	No	We will not support measures that weaken national security. This is to say that measures that easen the access to weapons, difficult the identification of citizens, easen the formation and spread of chaos, or negatively impact the economy, such as banning arms exports or the use of autonomous weapons systems. Thus, we vote NO.
For Radical Reforms!	0	Abstain	We vote to abstain, because proposed changes contradict themselves. We support some of the proposed changes, but still we also not support the idea of changing the protest right, it is the same that were proposed in "Syndical rights act of 2021" and we think current protest rights are totally fair and not anarchic.
Radical Republican Union	42	No	Firearms ownership is proven to be a strong factor in insecurity, and it shall therefore remain a State monopoly. The exportation of weapons is also very profitable for Drumagh and it would be unwise to ban it in the though economical context we are in.
Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front	0	Yes	Moving from a total ban on firearms to a regulated system breaks the bourgeois state's monopoly on violence and gives the people access to arms. As revolutionary theory teaches, power grows from the barrel of a gun: the working masses cannot emancipate themselves and defend against reaction without the material means of struggle. Furthermore, establishing a completely unrestricted right to assembly, coupled with the ban on autonomous weapons and arms exports, deals a direct blow to the military-industrial complex and the repressive tools of the bourgeoisie. It is a wholesome breach for proletarian liberties and revolutionary organization!
peopleswing Proposer	17	Yes	No reason given

The People’s Assembly

Failed

34Yes 133No 33Not voted 200 seats

For: 34 / 200 seats (17.0%)

Against: 133 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 33

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 20.4%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Centralist Unity	50	No	We will not support measures that weaken national security. This is to say that measures that easen the access to weapons, difficult the identification of citizens, easen the formation and spread of chaos, or negatively impact the economy, such as banning arms exports or the use of autonomous weapons systems. Thus, we vote NO.
For Radical Reforms!	0	Abstain	We vote to abstain, because proposed changes contradict themselves. We support some of the proposed changes, but still we also not support the idea of changing the protest right, it is the same that were proposed in "Syndical rights act of 2021" and we think current protest rights are totally fair and not anarchic.
Radical Republican Union	83	No	Firearms ownership is proven to be a strong factor in insecurity, and it shall therefore remain a State monopoly. The exportation of weapons is also very profitable for Drumagh and it would be unwise to ban it in the though economical context we are in.
Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front	0	Yes	Moving from a total ban on firearms to a regulated system breaks the bourgeois state's monopoly on violence and gives the people access to arms. As revolutionary theory teaches, power grows from the barrel of a gun: the working masses cannot emancipate themselves and defend against reaction without the material means of struggle. Furthermore, establishing a completely unrestricted right to assembly, coupled with the ban on autonomous weapons and arms exports, deals a direct blow to the military-industrial complex and the repressive tools of the bourgeoisie. It is a wholesome breach for proletarian liberties and revolutionary organization!
peopleswing Proposer	34	Yes	No reason given

First Citizen

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Centralist Unity	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

For Radical Reforms!

Voted May 26, 2021

Abstain

“We vote to abstain, because proposed changes contradict themselves. We support some of the proposed changes, but still we also not support the idea of changing the protest right, it is the same that were proposed in "Syndical rights act of 2021" and we think current protest rights are totally fair and not anarchic.”

Radical Republican Union

Voted May 7, 2021

No

“Firearms ownership is proven to be a strong factor in insecurity, and it shall therefore remain a State monopoly. The exportation of weapons is also very profitable for Drumagh and it would be unwise to ban it in the though economical context we are in.”

Centralist Unity

Voted May 6, 2021

No

“We will not support measures that weaken national security. This is to say that measures that easen the access to weapons, difficult the identification of citizens, easen the formation and spread of chaos, or negatively impact the economy, such as banning arms exports or the use of autonomous weapons systems. Thus, we vote NO.”

Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front

Voted May 5, 2021

Yes

“Moving from a total ban on firearms to a regulated system breaks the bourgeois state's monopoly on violence and gives the people access to arms. As revolutionary theory teaches, power grows from the barrel of a gun: the working masses cannot emancipate themselves and defend against reaction without the material means of struggle. Furthermore, establishing a completely unrestricted right to assembly, coupled with the ban on autonomous weapons and arms exports, deals a direct blow to the military-industrial complex and the repressive tools of the bourgeoisie. It is a wholesome breach for proletarian liberties and revolutionary organization!”