“"Disarm the Police!" is proclaimed loudly while the reality of what this would cause is kept unmentioned: "... And let the troublemakers do as they please." We vote NO for this measure that weakens Drumagh, the safety and security of its citizens and of itself!”
Police Reform Act of 2023
Rationale
Reducing armed police presence improves public trust and reduces unnecessary escalation in routine encounters, enhancing community safety and well-being.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armed Police |
Police routinely carry military-grade weapons
|
Mostly unarmed; specialist armed units on call
|
1
Armed PoliceProposer
Party
Progressive Democratic Union
the Progressive Democrats are a centrist - center right liberal party based on the ideas of a free and fair market , social spending with precaution and social liberalism.
Core pillars
Benjamin Wilson
Minister for Finance · Age 31
A 23-year-old orator and policy wonk whose relentless energy in student debates and speech competitions earned him a reputation as a rising star, now bringing his sharp pragmatism and unshakable loyalty to the movement.
Timeline
-
Draft11 June 2023
-
Vote Open11 June 2023
-
Vote Closed10 August 2023
-
Did Not Become Law10 August 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
FailedFor: 26 / 100 seats (26.0%)
Against: 41 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 33
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 23 | No | "Disarm the Police!" is proclaimed loudly while the reality of what this would cause is kept unmentioned: "... And let the troublemakers do as they please." We vote NO for this measure that weakens Drumagh, the safety and security of its citizens and of itself! |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement | 18 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union Proposer | 18 | Yes | No reason given |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 0 | No | The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front stands for a disciplined, well-armed security apparatus that protects the people firmly and without hesitation. We vote NO on this article. |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 8 | Yes | A good reform with great liberty |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Yes | this is great for liberty |
The People’s Assembly
FailedFor: 52 / 200 seats (26.0%)
Against: 82 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 66
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 46 | No | "Disarm the Police!" is proclaimed loudly while the reality of what this would cause is kept unmentioned: "... And let the troublemakers do as they please." We vote NO for this measure that weakens Drumagh, the safety and security of its citizens and of itself! |
| Libertarian Congress | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| New Morning Movement | 36 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union Proposer | 35 | Yes | No reason given |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 0 | No | The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front stands for a disciplined, well-armed security apparatus that protects the people firmly and without hesitation. We vote NO on this article. |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 17 | Yes | A good reform with great liberty |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Yes | this is great for liberty |
First Citizen
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front stands for a disciplined, well-armed security apparatus that protects the people firmly and without hesitation. We vote NO on this article.”
“A good reform with great liberty”
“We can't support this bill”
“this is great for liberty”