“We can’t support this bill”
Online Safety And Social Media Accountability of 2023
Rationale
Stärka skyddet mot skadligt innehåll online genom hårdare regleringar för att öka tryggheten och minska spridningen av missinformation och hat.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Online Safety & Social Media |
Minimal duties, free-speech priority
|
Strict legal duties, heavy fines, takedowns
|
1
Online Safety & Social MediaProposer
Party
Hilmer
Hilmer blazes the trail of relentless progress lifting all through bold markets and unstoppable growth.
Core pillars
Frederick Hill
Activist · Age 55
A former dockworker who fought his way up from the shop floor after years of dead-end jobs, Frederick Hill’s blunt honesty and knack for solving problems without nonsense won him a loyal following long before formal politics.
Timeline
-
Draft2 July 2023
-
Vote Open2 July 2023
-
Vote Closed31 August 2023
-
Did Not Become Law31 August 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
FailedFor: 0 / 100 seats (0.0%)
Against: 65 · Abstained: 19 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 19 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Hilmer Proposer | 0 | Yes | Because we want to help you |
| Libertarian Congress | 21 | No | Let them businesses regulate themselves |
| New Morning Movement | 18 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 18 | No | Any attempt to regulate speech will inevitably end in violation of citizens rights. While we don't believe this bill was proposed with ill intent, we do believe that this bill would produce a more authotharian drumagh |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 8 | No | We can’t support this bill |
The People’s Assembly
FailedFor: 0 / 200 seats (0.0%)
Against: 129 · Abstained: 38 · Not voted: 33
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 38 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Hilmer Proposer | 0 | Yes | Because we want to help you |
| Libertarian Congress | 41 | No | Let them businesses regulate themselves |
| New Morning Movement | 36 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 35 | No | Any attempt to regulate speech will inevitably end in violation of citizens rights. While we don't believe this bill was proposed with ill intent, we do believe that this bill would produce a more authotharian drumagh |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 17 | No | We can’t support this bill |
First Citizen
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Libertarian Congress | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We can't support this bill”
“Let them businesses regulate themselves”
“Any attempt to regulate speech will inevitably end in violation of citizens rights. While we don't believe this bill was proposed with ill intent, we do believe that this bill would produce a more authotharian drumagh”