National Security Identity And Tobacco Ban of 2023 - Drumagh

Rationale

To enhance national security and public health by reducing identity fraud and eliminating tobacco-related diseases through strict biometric ID and a total ban on addictive products.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	National Identity Cards	No national ID card		Mandatory biometric ID + central register
2	Tobacco & Vaping Regulation	Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)		Total ban on tobacco and vaping products; possession criminalized

1

National Identity Cards

Previous law

No national ID card

Mandatory biometric ID + central register

2

Tobacco & Vaping Regulation

Previous law

Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)

Total ban on tobacco and vaping products; possession criminalized

Proposer

Party

Centralist Unity

Centralist Unity forges a nation of order and strength! We will restore the authority of the central government and bring back the glory and prosperity that has been robbed from our motherland.

Core pillars

Edmund Thomas

Activist · Age 56

117,936 social followers

A former theology professor turned fiery orator, Edmund Thomas has spent decades rallying supporters with his commanding presence and unwavering devotion to the cause, always guided by his unshakable ideals.

🔬 Analytical ✨ Charismatic 🎤 Fantastic Speaker 🌟 Idealist 🤝 Loyal

Timeline

Draft

28 May 2023
Vote Open

28 May 2023
Vote Closed

27 July 2023
Did Not Become Law

27 July 2023

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

First Council of Ministers

Failed

23Yes 65No 12Not voted 100 seats

For: 23 / 100 seats (23.0%)

Against: 65 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 12

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 26.1%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Centralist Unity Proposer	23	Yes	No reason given
Libertarian Congress	21	No	I am sorry but this is exactly opposite what we support
New Morning Movement	18	No	We can't support this bill!
Progressive Democratic Union	18	No	Ah yes a central register, so hackers have a easier time getting the sensitive data of citizens. Its pretty clear we oppose this proposal
Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front	0	Yes	The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front does not shy away from strong state action when it strengthens discipline, security, and collective well-being. We vote YES on both articles.
The Democratic Workersparty	8	No	The story with ID can become a law but second article is not acceptable.
The United Workers Front	0	Abstain	remove article 1 and im in

The People’s Assembly

Failed

46Yes 129No 25Not voted 200 seats

For: 46 / 200 seats (23.0%)

Against: 129 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 25

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 26.3%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Centralist Unity Proposer	46	Yes	No reason given
Libertarian Congress	41	No	I am sorry but this is exactly opposite what we support
New Morning Movement	36	No	We can't support this bill!
Progressive Democratic Union	35	No	Ah yes a central register, so hackers have a easier time getting the sensitive data of citizens. Its pretty clear we oppose this proposal
Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front	0	Yes	The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front does not shy away from strong state action when it strengthens discipline, security, and collective well-being. We vote YES on both articles.
The Democratic Workersparty	17	No	The story with ID can become a law but second article is not acceptable.
The United Workers Front	0	Abstain	remove article 1 and im in

First Citizen

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Libertarian Congress	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front

Voted June 13, 2023

Yes

“The Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front does not shy away from strong state action when it strengthens discipline, security, and collective well-being. We vote YES on both articles.”