Ces réformes modernisent les politiques pour plus de sécurité, d’équité sociale et d’efficacité économique au service de tous les citoyens.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuclear Weapons |
Retain weapons, pledge no first use
|
Maintain a minimal deterrent
|
|
| 2 | Marijuana Policy |
Legalization (age 21; licensed retail; THC tax; roadside impairment tests)
|
Full prohibition (possession criminalized; prison possible for repeat offences)
|
|
| 3 | Women in the Armed Forces |
This Is An Order — a mandatory quota for the proportion of women in the armed forces
|
Equal Participation — women serve alongside men on equal terms
|
|
| 4 | Military Service Policy |
Volunteer professional army
|
Conscription from 18-25
|
|
| 5 | Gig Economy & Platform Workers |
Platform workers are independent contractors; no protections required
|
Gig workers classified as employees with full rights (sick pay, holiday, pensions)
|
Party
We forge a nation where ambition is duty and progress is sacred. The future is built on hard work free markets and unshakable faith in what we make.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 34
Jonathan Graves built his career as a behind-the-scenes power broker, leveraging his charm and media savvy to turn obscure policies into headline-friendly victories for the party.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 17 / 100 seats (17.0%)
Against: 77 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 6
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 11 | Yes | YES! CU fully supports this measures to secure the safety and wellbeing of Drumagh and its citizens. |
| Libertarian Congress | 21 | No | Article 2 and 5 are unacceptable |
| New Morning Movement | 26 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Parti Nationaliste Républicain Proposer | 6 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 21 | No | This proposal restricts civil liberties, violates civil liberties in non emergency situations (by introducing conscription in peacetime) , and criminalizes weed which would increase pressure on our police force and pile more work on them after an already stretched budget. The PDU could plausibly support Art. 1 , 3 and 5 . However we cannot tolerate the restriction of civil liberties as detailed above |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 9 | No | We cannot support this bill |
For: 34 / 200 seats (17.0%)
Against: 153 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 13
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 22 | Yes | YES! CU fully supports this measures to secure the safety and wellbeing of Drumagh and its citizens. |
| Libertarian Congress | 42 | No | Article 2 and 5 are unacceptable |
| New Morning Movement | 52 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Parti Nationaliste Républicain Proposer | 12 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 41 | No | This proposal restricts civil liberties, violates civil liberties in non emergency situations (by introducing conscription in peacetime) , and criminalizes weed which would increase pressure on our police force and pile more work on them after an already stretched budget. The PDU could plausibly support Art. 1 , 3 and 5 . However we cannot tolerate the restriction of civil liberties as detailed above |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 18 | No | We cannot support this bill |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Democratic Union | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We cannot support this bill”
“This proposal restricts civil liberties, violates civil liberties in non emergency situations (by introducing conscription in peacetime) , and criminalizes weed which would increase pressure on our police force and pile more work on them after an already stretched budget. The PDU could plausibly support Art. 1 , 3 and 5 . However we cannot tolerate the restriction of civil liberties as detailed above”
“YES! CU fully supports this measures to secure the safety and wellbeing of Drumagh and its citizens.”
“We can't support this bill”
“Article 2 and 5 are unacceptable”