These reforms modernize economic policy to balance stability, growth, and fairness while protecting public interests and workers' rights.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Capital controls, separated retail/investment banking
|
Strong prudential oversight
|
|
| 2 | Foreign Land Ownership |
Abolish all private land ownership; all land held by the state
|
Foreign ownership limited to commercial property only; residential banned
|
|
| 3 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Nationalise all key utilities and transport
|
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
|
| 4 | Right to Strike |
Unrestricted right to strike, incl. solidarity action
|
Protected with a lawful ballot
|
|
| 5 | Trade Union Rights |
All enterprises must be majority worker-owned cooperatives
|
Full collective bargaining and strike rights
|
Party
Centralist Unity forges a nation of order and strength! We will restore the authority of the central government and bring back the glory and prosperity that has been robbed from our motherland.
Core pillars
Minister of Health & Human Services · Age 25
At 21, Sarah Hall is already a rising star in political circles, blending sharp academic insight with fiery idealism and an uncompromising refusal to bend to political expediency.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 44 / 100 seats (44.0%)
Against: 32 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 24
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 27 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 17 | Yes | Yes but you should have gone further |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 32 | No | we must not go back on the achievements of the Proletarian Revolution! |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
For: 87 / 200 seats (43.5%)
Against: 64 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 49
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity Proposer | 53 | Yes | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 34 | Yes | Yes but you should have gone further |
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 64 | No | we must not go back on the achievements of the Proletarian Revolution! |
| The United Workers Front | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolutionary Maoist Communist Front | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“we must not go back on the achievements of the Proletarian Revolution!”
“Yes but you should have gone further”