Relaxing tobacco rules balances harm reduction with personal freedom, selective schools improve equity, and national housing targets address shortages efficiently.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tobacco & Vaping Regulation |
Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)
|
Light regulation (age 18, designated smoking areas, health warnings)
|
|
| 2 | School Selection |
Comprehensive, no selection
|
Some selective schools
|
|
| 3 | Housing Supply & Planning |
Override local objections, build at scale
|
Strong national housing targets
|
Party
The Democratic Workers Party is a centrist, worker-oriented party committed to building a strong, prosperous and democratic society. We believe that education, modern infrastructure and secure employment are the foundations of long-term national progress.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 23
A 22-year-old philosophy graduate turned viral campaigner, Dorothy Gallagher rose to prominence as a student leader fighting tuition hikes, her razor-sharp debating skills and unshakable principles making her a thorn in the side of entrenched elites.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 29 / 100 seats (29.0%)
Against: 36 · Abstained: 19 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 19 | Abstain | We can't support reducing regulations on tobacco. Smoking is a social disease and must be eliminated. Despite this, we support articles 2 and 3, and thus will neither endorse nor condemm this bill. |
| Libertarian Congress | 21 | Yes | We like this. Good job |
| New Morning Movement | 18 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 18 | No | While we support some provisions within this bill, namely Art. 2 and 3 . We do not believe a relaxation of tobbaco policy to be the utmost priority |
| The Democratic Workersparty Proposer | 8 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 58 / 200 seats (29.0%)
Against: 71 · Abstained: 38 · Not voted: 33
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 38 | Abstain | We can't support reducing regulations on tobacco. Smoking is a social disease and must be eliminated. Despite this, we support articles 2 and 3, and thus will neither endorse nor condemm this bill. |
| Libertarian Congress | 41 | Yes | We like this. Good job |
| New Morning Movement | 36 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 35 | No | While we support some provisions within this bill, namely Art. 2 and 3 . We do not believe a relaxation of tobbaco policy to be the utmost priority |
| The Democratic Workersparty Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Libertarian Congress | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We like this. Good job”
“We can't support this bill”
“We can't support reducing regulations on tobacco. Smoking is a social disease and must be eliminated. Despite this, we support articles 2 and 3, and thus will neither endorse nor condemm this bill.”
“While we support some provisions within this bill, namely Art. 2 and 3 . We do not believe a relaxation of tobbaco policy to be the utmost priority”