“misma opinion que los demás”
Market Liberalisation And Labour Reforms Act of 2024
Rationale
These reforms will boost economic efficiency by reducing bureaucratic barriers, cutting costs for businesses and consumers while fostering growth through market-driven competition and flexibility.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Private, with strong regulation
|
Privatise and lightly regulate
|
|
| 2 | Public Procurement Rules |
Open competitive tendering on value for money
|
Lowest-cost bidder wins; no other criteria may be applied
|
|
| 3 | Retail Planning & Licensing |
Planning permission required for large stores; otherwise open
|
Presumption in favour of new stores; no size limits
|
|
| 4 | Right to Strike |
Protected with a lawful ballot
|
Banned/limited in essential services
|
|
| 5 | Severance & Redundancy Pay |
Statutory severance for long-serving staff
|
Statutory notice period only
|
1
Public Ownership of Key Industries2
Public Procurement Rules3
Retail Planning & Licensing4
Right to Strike5
Severance & Redundancy PayProposer
Party
New Morning Movement
A movement for economic freedom, smaller government, and individual initiative. We champion free markets, lower taxes, and personal responsibility. Inspired by the conviction that prosperity comes from people, not the state. No compromise, no retreat, no turning back!
Core pillars
Thomas Hill
Candidate for First Citizen · Age 41
A former soldier turned firebrand provocateur, Thomas Hill’s explosive charisma and radical zeal electrify crowds, blending street-smart instincts with a reputation as a man of action.
Timeline
-
Draft30 September 2024
-
Vote Open30 September 2024
-
Vote Closed29 November 2024
-
Did Not Become Law29 November 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
FailedFor: 29 / 100 seats (29.0%)
Against: 71 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 19 | No | This measures will allow Elites to run the land and then soon they will run the government, thus ending the only force capable of forcing them to fall in line for the common good of Drumagh! |
| Distributists | 10 | No | same reason for previous no |
| Freedom Alliance | 11 | No | Complete disaster for the economy. |
| Frente De Izquierda Y Trabajadores | 2 | No | misma opinion que los demás |
| New Morning Movement Proposer | 29 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 29 | No | We could agree with Art. 3 , however everything else is quite distasteful in our view |
The People’s Assembly
FailedFor: 58 / 200 seats (29.0%)
Against: 142 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 38 | No | This measures will allow Elites to run the land and then soon they will run the government, thus ending the only force capable of forcing them to fall in line for the common good of Drumagh! |
| Distributists | 20 | No | same reason for previous no |
| Freedom Alliance | 22 | No | Complete disaster for the economy. |
| Frente De Izquierda Y Trabajadores | 4 | No | misma opinion que los demás |
| New Morning Movement Proposer | 58 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 58 | No | We could agree with Art. 3 , however everything else is quite distasteful in our view |
First Citizen
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Hill Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“same reason for previous no”
“Complete disaster for the economy.”
“We could agree with Art. 3 , however everything else is quite distasteful in our view”
“This measures will allow Elites to run the land and then soon they will run the government, thus ending the only force capable of forcing them to fall in line for the common good of Drumagh!”