“We don’t support it , it’s a insult for the people”
Market-Friendly Economic Restructuring Act of 2023
Rationale
This bill draws inspiration from the advice offered by our friends in the Rheinland to boost our economy and strengthen our prosperity!
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minimum Wage Policy |
Maximum wage cap (no one may earn more than 10x the lowest-paid worker)
|
Basic minimum wage
|
|
| 2 | Competition & Monopolies |
Proactively break up dominant firms
|
Permissive on mergers and scale
|
|
| 3 | Automation & the Workforce |
Market-led automation
|
Actively incentivise automation
|
|
| 4 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Strong prudential oversight
|
Light-touch regulation
|
|
| 5 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
Privatise and lightly regulate
|
1
Minimum Wage Policy2
Competition & Monopolies3
Automation & the Workforce4
Banking & Financial Regulation5
Public Ownership of Key IndustriesProposer
Party
New Morning Movement
A movement for economic freedom, smaller government, and individual initiative. We champion free markets, lower taxes, and personal responsibility. Inspired by the conviction that prosperity comes from people, not the state. No compromise, no retreat, no turning back!
Core pillars
Thomas Hill
Candidate for First Citizen · Age 41
A former soldier turned firebrand provocateur, Thomas Hill’s explosive charisma and radical zeal electrify crowds, blending street-smart instincts with a reputation as a man of action.
Timeline
-
Draft10 March 2023
-
Vote Open10 March 2023
-
Vote Closed9 May 2023
-
Became Law9 May 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
First Council of Ministers
PassedFor: 40 / 100 seats (40.0%)
Against: 16 · Abstained: 48 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 19 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 28 | Yes | Could go further but we agree with this all |
| New Morning Movement Proposer | 12 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 29 | Abstain | While we agree with Article 4 . We ultimately believe this bill goes too far |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 1 | No | We don’t support it , it’s a insult for the people |
| The United Workers Front | 15 | No | We cannot &accept theese measures that looks like Austerity ! |
The People’s Assembly
PassedFor: 81 / 200 seats (40.5%)
Against: 32 · Abstained: 96 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centralist Unity | 38 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Libertarian Congress | 57 | Yes | Could go further but we agree with this all |
| New Morning Movement Proposer | 24 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Democratic Union | 58 | Abstain | While we agree with Article 4 . We ultimately believe this bill goes too far |
| The Democratic Workersparty | 3 | No | We don’t support it , it’s a insult for the people |
| The United Workers Front | 29 | No | We cannot &accept theese measures that looks like Austerity ! |
First Citizen
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“While we agree with Article 4 . We ultimately believe this bill goes too far”
“Could go further but we agree with this all”
“We cannot &accept theese measures that looks like Austerity !”